Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Eugene Lee Rushton v. State of Minnesota, 889 N.W.2d 561.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
The longest and shortest terms in the presumptive range are commonly called the ‘top of the box’ and the ‘bottom of the box.’” n.2 (Minn. 2021) ( n.2 (Minn. 2017)) (citation omitted).
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Eloisa Rubi Plancarte, Appellant Minn. 2025
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Eloisa Rubi Plancarte, Appellant
Minn. 2025
(explaining that we must “interpret a statute as a whole so as to harmonize and give effect to all its parts”) (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)).
- State of Minnesota v. Eloisa Rubi Plancarte Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Eloisa Rubi Plancarte
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
The breastfeeding exclusion is significant for our analysis, because we must “interpret a statute as a whole so as to harmonize and give effect to all its parts, and where possible, no word, phrase, or sentence will be held superfluous, void, or insignificant.” (quotation omitted).
-
Minn. 2022
(“When possible, we interpret statutes to give effect to all parts and ‘no word, phrase, or sentence will be held superfluous, void, or insignificant.’ ” ()).
-
State of Minnesota,
Minn. 2021
Guidelines 1.B.13.b –c. The longest and shortest terms in the presumptive range are commonly called the “top of the box” and the “bottom of the box.” See Rushton v. State , n.2 (Minn. 2017).
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
- State of Minnesota, Minn. 2018
- Erin G. Aasen, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(stating that “the district court has the discretion to specify any minimum term of imprisonment that falls within the presumptive range as the minimum terms of imprisonment”).
- State ex rel. Huseby v. Roy 903 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-
State ex rel. Huseby v. Roy
903 N.W.2d 633
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
in light of their context.” (quotations omitted); (holding that phrase “minimum term of imprisonment,” in statute requiring -district court to specify a minimum term of imprisonment that must be served before offender may be considered for supervised release, means any sentence falling within presumptive range of sentencing guidelines).
- A17-0040 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Rushton v. State , ; see also Minn. Sent.
- State v. Kirby 899 N.W.2d 485 Minn. 2017
- State v. Dotson 900 N.W.2d 445 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- State v. Dotson 900 N.W.2d 445 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- State v. Eide 898 N.W.2d 290 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- State v. Eide 898 N.W.2d 290 Minn. Ct. App. 2017