Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. S.A.M., 891 N.W.2d 602.
-
A25-0013 A25-0014 A25-0015
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
And in State v. S.A.M., the Minnesota Supreme Court explained that the expungement statute “clearly organizes crimes into clauses in order of severity, provides longer waiting periods for expungement of more serious crimes, and requires a person to petition for expungement under the clause that addresses the crime for which the person was convicted.” –08 (Minn. 2017).
- In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. K. and A. S., Parents 9 N.W.3d 174 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. K. and A. S., Parents
9 N.W.3d 174
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(noting that operative language “has convictions” required court to look to present status of conviction, while statute that took effect when defendant “has been convicted” referred to past time periods); Overweg, d at 184 (supreme court noting that statutory phrase “has previously been
-
Johnsonville, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, Relator,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
When interpreting a statute, we attempt to “ascertain and effectuate the intent of the Legislature.”
- A19-1113 A19-1115 A19-1116 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- State of Minnesota, Minn. 2019
- State v. Wood 922 N.W.2d 209 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-
State v. Wood
922 N.W.2d 209
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
604-08 (Minn. 2017) ; In re Dakota County , , 911-13 (Minn. 2015) ; State v. Wenthe , , 303 (Minn. 2015) ; Occhino , d at 359-61 ; In re Robledo , , 69 (Minn. App. 2000).
- State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
- A17-0729 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- State v. Prigge 900 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- State v. Prigge 900 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 2017