Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Montemayor v. Sebright Products, Inc., 898 N.W.2d 623.

268 citing documents.

ExteNet Systems, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Appellate courts “review the grant of summary judgment de novo to determine whether there are genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (quotation omitted).
Chad Loran Siegel, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“We review the grant of summary judgment de novo to determine ‘whether there are genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.’” Montemayor v. Sebright Pro ds., Inc., (quoting Stringer v. Minn. Vikings Football Club, LLC, ).
Groebner and Associates, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (“All doubts and factual inferences must be resolved against the moving party.” (quotation omitted)).
Larry Nettles, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
3 DECISION “We review the grant of summary judgment de novo to determine whether there are genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (quotation omitted).
James Thomas Miller, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc.
Justin Bolton, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc.
Hugh McTavish, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
We review a district court’s summary-judgment decision de novo “to determine whether there are genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (quotation omitted); see also Minn. R. Civ.
SECURA Insurance Company, as subrogee of Lance Goettl d/b/a TLG Farm Partnership v. Deere & Company, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
SECURA Insurance Company, as subrogee of Lance Goettl d/b/a TLG Farm Partnership v. Deere & Company, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (describing summary-judgment standard).
Maria Olson, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“We review the grant of summary judgment de novo to determine whether there are genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (quotation omitted).
Bruce Westman, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
DECISION Appellate courts “review the grant of summary judgment de novo to determine whether there are genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (quotation omitted).
Michael M Whalen, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc.
David Jaworski, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo “to determine whether there are genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (quotation omitted).
McLaughlin’s Detroit Lakes, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc.
ROA Rochester v. City of Byron Minn. Ct. App. 2024
ROA Rochester v. City of Byron Minn. Ct. App. 2024
DECISION We review a district court’s “grant of summary judgment de novo to determine whether there are genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (quotation omitted); see Minn. R. Civ.
David Bissen v. City of Crystal, JUFH Enterprises LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2024
David Bissen v. City of Crystal, JUFH Enterprises LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“We review the grant of summary judgment de novo to determine whether there are genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (quotation omitted).
Lorenzo Reed v. Westgate Investments, Inc. 8 N.W.3d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Lorenzo Reed v. Westgate Investments, Inc. 8 N.W.3d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
1 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo to determine “whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., d 623, 628 (Minn. 2017) (quotation omitted); see also Minn. R. Civ.
Jaime Lindbom as Guardian Ad Litem for Emma Lindbom v. Becker Independent School District, 726, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Shane Feldhaus v. City of Minnetonka Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Gregory T. Dyrdal v. James Wallenberg Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Gregory T. Dyrdal v. James Wallenberg Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., see also Kenneh v. Homeward Bound, Inc.
Jaime Lindbom as Guardian Ad Litem for Emma Lindbom v. Becker Independent School District, 726, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“We review the grant of summary judgment de novo to determine whether there are genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (quotation omitted).
Shane Feldhaus v. City of Minnetonka Minn. Ct. App. 2024
DECISION Appellate courts “review the grant of summary judgment de novo.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc.
Stockholm Township v. Glenn A. Schmidt, Bancommunity Service Corporation, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Stockholm Township v. Glenn A. Schmidt, Bancommunity Service Corporation, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
3 DECISION Appellate courts “review the grant of summary judgment de novo to determine whether there are genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (quotation omitted).
EP Land LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
8 We review a district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo to determine “whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (quotation omitted).
1648 Properties, LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Montemayor v. Sebright Products, Inc.
Vernon G. Muggli v. Leiding Township, Kenneth Brokaw Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Vernon G. Muggli v. Leiding Township, Kenneth Brokaw Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., see Minn. R. Civ.
In the Matter of the Petition of U.S. Bank, National Association as Legal Title Trustee for Truman 2016 … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
We review a district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo to determine “whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (quotation 5 omitted); see also Minn. R. Civ.
Great Northwest Insurance Company v. Hector A. Campbell, Betty L. Campbell, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Great Northwest Insurance Company v. Hector A. Campbell, Betty L. Campbell, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
ANALYSIS Appellate courts “review the grant of summary judgment de novo to determine whether there are genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (quotation omitted).
Chase Rovere v. Clifford Ling Minn. Ct. App. 2024
A22-1770 In the Matter of the Trust established under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement relating to the Wachovia … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
A22-1770 In the Matter of the Trust established under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement relating to the Wachovia … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
We review de novo a grant of summary judgment “to determine whether there are genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (quotation omitted); see also Minn. R. Civ.
Chase Rovere v. Clifford Ling Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“We review the grant of summary judgment de novo to determine ‘whether there are genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.’” Montemayor v. Sebright Products, Inc., (quoting Stringer v. Minn. Vikings Football Club, LLC, ).
Thomas Coleman v. City of Stillwater, RMR of Stillwater, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Thomas Coleman v. City of Stillwater, RMR of Stillwater, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2023
did not violate the city’s tree and forest protection ordinance; and (4) failing to rule on appellant’s “motion for a revote.” On appeal from summary judgment, this court reviews “the grant of summary judgment de novo to determine whether there are genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prod., Inc., (quotation omitted).
Board of Directors, Colony by the Greens Townhome Association, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Montemayor v. Sebright Prods ., Inc., .
Joyce Walsh, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
An appellate court “review[s] the grant of summary judgment de novo to determine ‘whether there are genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.’” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (quoting Stringer v. Minn. Vikings Football Club, LLC, ); see also Minn. R. Civ.
Pedro Alonzo, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Because these elements generally require factual determinations, “[s]ummary judgment is seldom granted on negligence issues.” see also Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (reversing grant of summary judgment in a negligence action because, in a “close case,” a jury should weigh evidence and make credibility determinations).
Freedom Kerkula, as Trustee for the Next of Kin of Grace Elizabeth Bettie, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc.
Craig A Reichel, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc.
Ali Alfureedy, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc.
A22-0724 Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We review the grant of summary judgment de novo to determine ‘whether there are genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.’” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (quoting Stringer v. Minn. Vikings Football Club, LLC, ).
Makenzie Moore, a minor, by and through her Conservator, First Fiduciary Corporation, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc.
South Country Health Alliance, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc.