Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hansen v. Todnem, 908 N.W.2d 592.

113 citing documents.

In re the Custody of P. K. M. S. and K. D. S., Jeremy Melvin Selin v. Tiah … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Greta Mae Markuson, n/k/a Greta Mae Garcia v. Brenden Peter Markuson Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Kimberly Kay Seidel v. Trevor Carlton Seidel Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Camilla Renae Lee v. Lyndon Carson Lee Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A district court has broad discretion to decide child custody, and parenting-time issues.
In re the Marriage of: Brett William Leschinsky v. Sarah Elizabeth Leschinsky Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Jesse A. Freking v. Audra Jo Buxengard f/k/a Audra Jo Freking Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“District courts have broad discretion on matters of custody and parenting time.” Hansen v. Todnem
In re the Custody of: K. M. A. Daniel Cory Johnson v. Erica Rose-Lynne Arends Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Matter of: Robert Burdette v. Jacinda Raiche Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(generally requiring the district court to “hold an evidentiary hearing to determine whether a modification is in the child’s best interests”), aff’d on other grounds
In re the Marriage of: Bijoy Raghavan v. Smeeta Antony Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Danielle M. Kerr, n/k/a Danielle M. Dubois v. Jonathan R. Kerr, County of … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Custody of A. M. W. Kelly James Wadsen v. Jennifer Maggie Rosenthal Minn. Ct. App. 2018
D E C I S I O N “District courts have broad discre tion on matters of custody and parenting time.” Hansen v. Todnem
Antoinette Kafui Totimeh v. Clement Olertey Totimeh Minn. Ct. App. 2018
10 place of abode for more than one-half of the taxable year.” d 51, 61 (Minn. App. 2017), aff’d on other grounds
In re the Marriage of: Samuel Thomas Shea Greenwood v. Kari Ann Greenwood Minn. Ct. App. 2018
D E C I S I O N “District courts have broa d discretion on matters of cu stody and parenting time.” Hansen v. Todnem

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by