Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Mosley, 895 N.W.2d 585.

117 citing documents.

Rossberg v. State 932 N.W.2d 6 Minn. 2019
Rossberg v. State 932 N.W.2d 6 Minn. 2019
State v. Mosley , , 591 (Minn. 2017).
Johnathan Bernard Edwards v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Appellate courts review a postconviction court’s application of the Strickland test “de novo because it involves a mixed question of law and fact.”
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Matthew Alan Radke Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re Commitment of Johnson 931 N.W.2d 649 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re Commitment of Johnson 931 N.W.2d 649 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Mosley , , 592 (Minn. 2017) (quotation omitted).
Michael David Henderson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
.” (quotation omitted) .
Raymond Baba Atimbaneme v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Mouelle 922 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 2019
State v. Mouelle 922 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 2019
State v. Mosley , , 591 (Minn. 2017).
State of Minnesota v. Buk Gaak Gany Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, vs Phillip Julius Butenhoff, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Robert Sam Raisch, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“To prove ineffective assistance of counsel, a de fendant must show that (1) his attorney’s performance fell below an obj ective standard of reasonabl eness, and (2) a reasonable probability exists that the outcome would have been differe nt, but for counsel’s errors.” State v. Mosley , (quotations omitted); see also Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 688, 694, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2064, 2068 (1984).
Joseph Duane Gustafson, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2018
6 Gustafson argues that his appellate counsel was ineffective because “[a]ppellate counsel flat out refused to argue that the state failed to provide [Gustafson] with effective assistance of counsel for his trial.” the supreme court rejected a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel based on defendant’s allegation that appellate counsel refused to raise a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel.
State of Minnesota v. Boe Michael Tankersley Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“To prove ineffective assistance of counsel, a defe ndant must show that (1) his attorney’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, and (2) a reasonable probability exists that the outcome would have been different, but for counsel’s errors.” (quotations omitted ).
Jermaine Sylvester Watkins v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“To prove ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show that (1) his attorney ’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, and (2) a reasonable probability exists that the outcome would have been different, but for counsel’s errors.” (quotations omitted); see also Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 688, 694, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2064, 2068 (1984).
Jason Edward Banks v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2018

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by