DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Mosley, 895 N.W.2d 585.

113 citing documents.

  • In re Commitment of Johnson 931 N.W.2d 649 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
  • In re Commitment of Johnson 931 N.W.2d 649 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    State v. Mosley , , 592 (Minn. 2017) (quotation omitted).
  • Michael David Henderson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    .” (quotation omitted) .
  • Raymond Baba Atimbaneme, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
  • State v. Mouelle 922 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 2019
  • State v. Mouelle 922 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 2019
    State v. Mosley , , 591 (Minn. 2017).
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
  • Robert Sam Raisch, Jr., petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
    “To prove ineffective assistance of counsel, a de fendant must show that (1) his attorney’s performance fell below an obj ective standard of reasonabl eness, and (2) a reasonable probability exists that the outcome would have been differe nt, but for counsel’s errors.” State v. Mosley , (quotations omitted); see also Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 688, 694, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2064, 2068 (1984).
  • Joseph Duane Gustafson, Jr., petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
    6 Gustafson argues that his appellate counsel was ineffective because “[a]ppellate counsel flat out refused to argue that the state failed to provide [Gustafson] with effective assistance of counsel for his trial.” the supreme court rejected a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel based on defendant’s allegation that appellate counsel refused to raise a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
    “To prove ineffective assistance of counsel, a defe ndant must show that (1) his attorney’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, and (2) a reasonable probability exists that the outcome would have been different, but for counsel’s errors.” (quotations omitted ).
  • Jermaine Sylvester Watkins, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
    “To prove ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show that (1) his attorney ’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, and (2) a reasonable probability exists that the outcome would have been different, but for counsel’s errors.” (quotations omitted); see also Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 688, 694, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2064, 2068 (1984).
  • Jason Edward Banks, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018