Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bandemer v. Ford Motor Co., 931 N.W.2d 744.

21 citing documents.

Medtronic, Inc. v. Matthew Lahn, AlphaTec Spine, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Medtronic, Inc. v. Matthew Lahn, AlphaTec Spine, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota, by its Attorney General, Keith Ellison v. American Petroleum Institute, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota, by its Attorney General, Keith Ellison v. American Petroleum Institute, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“Whether personal jurisdiction exists is a question of law, which [appellate courts] review de novo.” (quotation omitted).
Timothy John Walvatne, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
When it is a close call, appellate courts “resolve any doubt in favor 10 of retaining jurisdiction.” aff’d, Ford Motor Co. v. Mont.
Shawn Peters, Respondent, vs. Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., a Korean Corporation, Appellant, Samsung SDI America, Inc., a ... Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Shawn Peters, Respondent, vs. Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., a Korean Corporation, Appellant, Samsung SDI America, Inc., a ... Minn. Ct. App. 2025
And when it is a close call, appellate courts “resolve any doubt in favor of retaining jurisdiction.” Bandemer v. Ford Motor Co., 6 aff’d, Ford Motor Co. v. Mont.
Myth Live II Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A24-1652 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“After a defendant challenges a court’s exercise of personal jurisdiction, the plaintiff must make a prima facie showing that personal jurisdiction is proper.” aff’d sub nom.
U.S. Holdings, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
6 “Whether personal jurisdiction exists is a question of law, which [appellate courts] review de novo.” (quotation omitted).
Gopher Mats, LLC d/b/a Viking Mat Company, Cross-Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
The Due Process Clause limits a state’s ability “to exercise its coercive power by asserting jurisdiction over [nonresident] defendants.” see also U.S. Const. amend.
A24-0478 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
the district court determined that it had specific personal jurisdiction over Dr. Manjunath.
Jennifer A. Hindermann, as executrix of the Estate of David K. Hindermann and as beneficiary of the Revocable … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Whether personal jurisdiction exists is a question of law, which [ appellate courts ] review de novo.” (quotation omitted).
Bruce A. Rasmussen & Associates, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“Whether personal jurisdiction exists is a question of law, which we review de novo.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota, by its Attorney General, Keith Ellison, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Under the Due Process Clause, personal jurisdiction may not be exercised over a nonresident defendant unless the defendant has “‘minimum contacts’ with the [forum] state and maintaining the lawsuit ‘does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.’” (quoting Int’l Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 316 (1945)), aff’d sub nom.
In re the Marriage of: Michael Robert Jacobson, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Juelich v. Yamazaki Mazak Optonics 6 Corp., -70 (Minn. 2004).
Lisa Stone, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Husky Construction, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
The Due Process Clause “limits the ability of a state to exercise its coercive power by asserting jurisdiction over non-resident defendants.” (citing Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Super.
William H. Davis, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Snap Fitness, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Bandemer v. Ford Motor Co. , cert.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Edward Everett Urbanek. Minn. Ct. App. 2019