Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Waiters, 929 N.W.2d 895.

105 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“When evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence, we carefully examine the record to determine whether the facts and the legitimate inferences drawn from them would permit the factfinder to reasonably c onclude that the de fendant was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the offense of which he was convicted.” (quotation and alternation omitted).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“When evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence, we caref ully examine the record to determine whether the facts and the legitimate inferences drawn from them would permit the fact-finder to reasonably conclude that the defendant was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the offense which he was convicted.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
3 doubt of the offense of which he was convicted.” (quotation omitted).