Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Waiters, 929 N.W.2d 895.

107 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Minn. 2020
“When a defendant alleges unobjected -to prosecutorial misconduct, we apply a modified plain -error standard that requires the defendant to show an error was made that was plain.” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Jessica Jo Huntington Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“When evaluating the sufficien cy of the evidence, we carefully examine the record to determine whether the facts and the legitimate inferences drawn from them would permit the factfinder to reasonably c onclude that the de fendant was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the offense of which he was convicted.” (quotation and alteration omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Curtis Akeem Banks Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Alexander James Menne Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“When evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence, we carefully examine the record to determine whether the facts and the legitimate inferences drawn from them would permit the factfinder to reasonably c onclude that the de fendant was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the offense of which he was convicted.” (quotation and alternation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Euric Ards Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“When evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence, we caref ully examine the record to determine whether the facts and the legitimate inferences drawn from them would permit the fact-finder to reasonably conclude that the defendant was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the offense which he was convicted.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Ronald James Lipe Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Jacob Ochan Yien Minn. Ct. App. 2019
3 doubt of the offense of which he was convicted.” (quotation omitted).