Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Doering v. Doering, 629 N.W.2d 124.

54 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Todd Charles Bork v. Carolyn Mitsu Bork Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In re the Marriage of: Todd Charles Bork v. Carolyn Mitsu Bork Minn. Ct. App. 2026
303.03(d) (noting some exceptions not relevant here); d 124, 130 (Minn. App. 2001), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A district court may summarily dispose of a fraud claim “only when there is no genuine issue of material fact in dispute and [when] a determination of the applicable law will resolve the controversy.” rev. denied (Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Kyle Ryan Johnson, A v. Danielle Marie Gilbert, B, Appellant.... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Kyle Ryan Johnson, A v. Danielle Marie Gilbert, B, Appellant.... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
2, the standard for reopening is ordinary fraud, not fraud on the court.2 rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Robert Thomas Nord, A v. Katherine Elizabeth Bowers, B, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Robert Thomas Nord, A v. Katherine Elizabeth Bowers, B, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-30 (Minn. App. 2001), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-30 (Minn. App. 2001), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Erica Hopper McMullen, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
25, 2003); (discussing affirmative duty to disclose information that is present for parties to dissolution), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Brad Allen Friesz, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Doering v. Doering , rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Lisa Marie Winkowski, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Doering v. Doering , review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
2 (provi ding that the subdivis ion does not limit the court’s power to set aside a judg ment for a fraud upon the court); (Mi nn.
In re the Marriage of: Tammy Kay Holleman, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(providing that the subdivision does not limit the court’s power to set aside a judgment for a fraud upon the court); (holding that ordinary fraud is the proper standard for motions brought 6 within one year of the judgment ), review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Richard T. Hudgins, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
303.03(d); Doering v. Doering , review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Jeffrey Alan Fish, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
-66 (Minn. 1983); review denied (Minn. Sept.
Explained In re the Marriage of: Greta Mae Markuson, n/k/a Greta Mae Garcia, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In Doering v. Doering, the case we relied on in Thompson, we explained that a motion to reopen a judgment “is an alternative to an ‘independent action to relieve a party from a judgment.’” (quoting Minn. Stat. § 518.145, subd.
In re the Marriage of: Denise Marie Kienholz, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-29 (Minn. App. 2001), review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Nicole Marie Anne Sanders, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Bollenbach v. Bollenbach , see also Doering v. Doering , -33 (Minn. App. 2001) (recognizing an affirmative duty to disclose even in the absence of a request in family proceedings), review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Carolynn Bitker, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-30 (Minn. App. 2001), review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Keith Jonathan Hempel, II, Decedent, Tobin Hempel and Joshua D. Krsnak, personal representatives … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2018
303.03(d); review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Lori Elaine Coleal, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Id.; -32 (Minn. App. 2001) (concluding that “[b]ecause appellant’s affidavits [were] sufficient to present a fact question of fraud, appellant established good cause for an evidentiary hearing on his motion to reopen the judgment”), review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Mashell Marie Bjorge v. Jason Willard Maahs Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Mashell Marie Bjorge v. Jason Willard Maahs Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-30 (Minn. App. 2001), review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Christopher John Anton v. Romona L. Sparks, f/k/a Romona L. Anton Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Christopher John Anton v. Romona L. Sparks, f/k/a Romona L. Anton Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marria ge of: Marla Jean Knapp v. James Alan Knapp 883 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marria ge of: Marla Jean Knapp v. James Alan Knapp 883 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
2, without mention of rule 60.02); –30 (Minn. App. 2001) (addressing standard for fraud under Minn. Stat. § 518.145, subd.
In re the Marriage of: Dontrell Valerie Thornton v. Herbert Thornton, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Dontrell Valerie Thornton v. Herbert Thornton, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
2 (2014); -30 (Minn. App. 2001), review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Holly v. Anderson v. Derrik T. Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Holly v. Anderson v. Derrik T. Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
only where there is no genuine issue of material fact in dispute and where a determination of the applicable law will resolve the controversy.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Dawn Marie Mondus Loger v. Cory Scott Loger Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Dawn Marie Mondus Loger v. Cory Scott Loger Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Brian Leon Boucher v. Xiuwen Li Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Brian Leon Boucher v. Xiuwen Li Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Heather Santilli Gamble v. John Stebbins Gamble Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Heather Santilli Gamble v. John Stebbins Gamble Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Sept.
Phillips v. LaPlante 823 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Phillips v. LaPlante 823 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
(holding that if separate post-decree motions are joined, time to appeal ruling on either motion does not begin to run until *908 both motions are finally determined), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Alam v. Chowdhury 764 N.W.2d 86 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Alam v. Chowdhury 764 N.W.2d 86 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
2 (noting that the subdivision’s list of reasons to reopen a dissolution judgment does not limit the court’s power “to set aside a judgment for fraud upon the court”); (distinguishing fraud from fraud on the court); -30 (Minn.App.2001) (same), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Marriage of Thompson v. Thompson 739 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Marriage of Thompson v. Thompson 739 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
303.03(d); review denied (Minn. Sept.
Stageberg v. Stageberg 695 N.W.2d 609 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Stageberg v. Stageberg 695 N.W.2d 609 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
(discussing affirmative duty to disclose information present for parties to dissolution proceed *618 ings), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Marriage of Kielley v. Kielley 674 N.W.2d 770 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Marriage of Kielley v. Kielley 674 N.W.2d 770 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
5; Karon, d at 503 (noting district court, as a third party to dissolution actions, “has a duty to protect the interests of both parties”); (discussing affirmative duty to disclose information that is present for parties to dissolution proceedings), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Eisenschenk v. Eisenschenk 668 N.W.2d 235 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Eisenschenk v. Eisenschenk 668 N.W.2d 235 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(discussing affirmative duty to disclose information that is present for parties to dissolution), review denied (Minn. Sept.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by