Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Rodewald, 376 N.W.2d 416.

32 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
422 (Minn. 1985); review denied (Minn. July 15, 1987).
State of Minnesota v. Damien Kent Hallmon Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Damien Kent Hallmon Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Illinois v. Lafayette, 462 U.S. 640, 647, 103 S. Ct. 2605, 2610 (1983) (drawing parallel between inventory search of impounded vehicle and inventory search incident to booking based on legitimate governmental interests served); –21 (Minn. 1985) (applying Lafayette to search of wallet incident to booking).
Mell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 757 N.W.2d 702 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Mell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 757 N.W.2d 702 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
738, 741 , 93 L.Ed.2d 739 (1987) (holding that such a search during booking functions to protect the suspect’s property, the police from claims of loss, theft, or vandalism, and the police from danger which could result from failing to search); (citing concerns similar to those in Bertine in holding that police may perform suspicionless examination of possessions of arrestees being jailed, including wallets).
State v. Volkman 675 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Volkman 675 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Ture 632 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 2001
State v. Ture 632 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 2001
State v. Mitchell, 285 Minn. 153, 161
State v. Fisher 588 N.W.2d 515 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Fisher 588 N.W.2d 515 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Holmes 569 N.W.2d 181 Minn. 1997
State v. Holmes 569 N.W.2d 181 Minn. 1997
for the proposition that the inventory exception to the warrant requirement is a “bright fine” rule, and that as long as the police follow “established, standardized procedures in conducting an inventory search, the search is valid and the motives of the officer conducting the search are entirely irre
State v. Lembke 509 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Lembke 509 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
(defendant arrested on bench warrant would inevitably be subject to involuntary search).
State v. White 489 N.W.2d 792 Minn. 1992
State v. White 489 N.W.2d 792 Minn. 1992
the Belton rule is a “bright line” rule authorizing a contemporaneous search of the passenger compartment of a car, including any containers found therein, *796 incident to the arrest of an occupant without the police having to make a particularized showing of need to conduct the search in order to find w
State v. Everett 472 N.W.2d 864 Minn. 1991
State v. Everett 472 N.W.2d 864 Minn. 1991
State v. Doughty 472 N.W.2d 299 Minn. 1991
State v. White 468 N.W.2d 556 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Doughty 456 N.W.2d 445 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Doughty 456 N.W.2d 445 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Hannuksela 452 N.W.2d 668 Minn. 1990
State v. Hannuksela 452 N.W.2d 668 Minn. 1990
In other relevant decisions, we, in effect, have relied upon "severability.” See
State v. Marshall 411 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Marshall 411 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Further, where the Minnesota Supreme Court held that police, pursuant to standardized procedures, may conduct an inventory search of any arrestee who is jailed and, as part of such a search, may examine all of the items, including the contents of the arres-tee’s wallet.
Geer v. State 406 N.W.2d 34 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Geer v. State 406 N.W.2d 34 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Joon Kyu Kim 398 N.W.2d 544 Minn. 1987
State v. Joon Kyu Kim 398 N.W.2d 544 Minn. 1987