Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Ryks v. Nieuwsma Livestock Equipment, 410 N.W.2d 380.
-
Donald D. Kern, Relator,
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
where the employee is simply frustrated or dissatisfied with his working conditions”); (stating that “mere dissatisfaction with working conditions” does not establish good cause).
-
Naomi Campbell, Relator,
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-83 (Minn. App. 1987) (concluding that an employee did not quit for good reason where the evidence did not support his argument that the employer breached an agreement for a specific commission rate).
- Nikol Dowls, Relator v. Select Comfort Retail Corporation, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Nikol Dowls, Relator v. Select Comfort Retail Corporation, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Velma Ostman, Relator v. Range Center, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Velma Ostman, Relator v. Range Center, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Roger Stoltz, Relator v. SMSC Gaming Enterprises - Mystic Lake Casino, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Roger Stoltz, Relator v. SMSC Gaming Enterprises - Mystic Lake Casino, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Lee Xiong, Relator v. Water Gremlin Co. (Corp.), Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
Lee Xiong, Relator v. Water Gremlin Co. (Corp.), Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Irreconcilable differences with an employer do not constitute 7 ‘good cause’ to quit, nor does mere dissatisfaction with working conditions.”
- Orin Vann, Relator v. Texas Roadhouse Holdings LLC - Texas Roadhouse, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
Orin Vann, Relator v. Texas Roadhouse Holdings LLC - Texas Roadhouse, Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-82 (Minn. App. 1987); (stating that dissatisfaction with supervisor and working conditions does not constitute good cause to quit).
- Brent D. Griffith, Relator v. Minnesota Department of Human Services, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Brent D. Griffith, Relator v. Minnesota Department of Human Services, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Crystal Longtin, Relator v. EEG, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
Crystal Longtin, Relator v. EEG, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Irreconcilable differences with an 7 employer do not constitute ‘good cause’ to quit, nor does mere dissatisfaction with working conditions.”
- Lamont P. Mays, Relator v. Rosenbauer Motors, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Lamont P. Mays, Relator v. Rosenbauer Motors, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Irreconcilable differences with an employer do not constitute ‘good cause’ to quit, nor does mere dissatisfaction with working conditions.”
- Lorraine Rosenthal, Relator v. Cardinal of Minnesota, Ltd., Department of Employment & Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Lorraine Rosenthal, Relator v. Cardinal of Minnesota, Ltd., Department of Employment & Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Robert S. Paxton, Relator v. Ind. School District 047, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Robert S. Paxton, Relator v. Ind. School District 047, Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Irreconcilable differences with an employer do not constitute ‘good cause’ to quit, nor does mere dissatisfaction with working conditions.”
- Benson Giwa, Relator v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- Benson Giwa, Relator v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- Haugen v. Superior Development, Inc. 819 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
- Haugen v. Superior Development, Inc. 819 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
- Kehoe v. Minnesota Department of Economic Security 568 N.W.2d 889 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
- Kehoe v. Minnesota Department of Economic Security 568 N.W.2d 889 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
- Shanahan v. District Memorial Hospital 495 N.W.2d 894 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-
Shanahan v. District Memorial Hospital
495 N.W.2d 894
Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Porrazzo v. Nabisco, Inc.
- Polley v. Gopher Bearing Co. 478 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 1991