DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Ward v. Ward, 453 N.W.2d 729.

22 citing documents.

  • In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
    at 177; rev. denied (Minn. June 6, 1990).
  • In re the Marriage of: Rachel Marie Benedict v. Thomas Jerry Benedict Minn. Ct. App. 2024
  • In re the Marriage of: Rachel Marie Benedict v. Thomas Jerry Benedict Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    A district court must make specific findings to support apportioning nonmarital property “based on all relevant factors and those included in [subdivision 2].” rev. denied (Minn. June 6, 1990).
  • In re the Marriage of: Jennifer Perrill, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    urt apportions nonmarital property, it must make findings on “all relevant factors including the length of the marriage, any prior marriage of a party, the age, health, station, occup ation, amount and sources of income, vocational skills, employability, estate, liabilities, needs, and opportunity for future acquisition of capital assets and income of each party.” Id; review denied (Minn. June 6, 1990).
  • In re the Marriage of: Kristy Ann Ryan, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    By contrast, compensation for personal injuries is nonmarital in nature because it represents “ injuries personal to a spouse.” d 729, 732 (Minn. App. 1990) (designating as nonmarital spouse’s workers’ compensation recovery for “[p]ain and suffering, disability, and loss of the ability to lead a normal healthy life”), review denied (Minn. June 6, 1990).
  • In re the Marriage of: Tracy Wong Belcher, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
    “A very severe disparity between the parties is required to sustain a finding of unfair hardship necessary to apportion nonmarital property” and should occur only in “an unusual case.” Ward v. Ward , (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. June 6, 1990).
  • In re the Marriage of: Rachel Lynn Rogers v. David Matthew Rogers Minn. Ct. App. 2016
  • In re the Marriage of: Rachel Lynn Rogers v. David Matthew Rogers Minn. Ct. App. 2016
    “A very severe disparity between the parties is required to sustain a finding of unfair hardship necessary to apportion nonmarital property” and should occur only in “an unusual case.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. June 6, 1990).
  • Stageberg v. Stageberg 695 N.W.2d 609 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
  • Stageberg v. Stageberg 695 N.W.2d 609 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
    “A very severe disparity between the parties is required to sustain a finding of unfair hardship necessary to apportion nonmarital property.” review denied (Minn. June 6, 1990).
  • Kyute v. Auslund 668 N.W.2d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • Pemberton v. Theis 668 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • Kyute v. Auslund 668 N.W.2d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
    Co., (stating that jury award for past medical expenses, past wage loss, and future medical expenses included award “only for economic damages” (emphasis in original)); (stating that compensation for future medical expenses and loss of future earning capacity, through settlement of a personal injury suit, are economic damages, as opposed to non-economic damages for pain and suffering), review denied (Minn. June 6, 1990)
  • Pemberton v. Theis 668 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
    See Johnson, d at 472 (holding that jury award for past medical expenses, past wage loss, and future medical expenses included award “only for economic damages”) (emphasis in original); (stating that compensation for future medical expenses and loss of future earning capacity, through settlement of personal injury suit, are economic damages, as opposed to noneconomic damages for pain and suffering), review denied (Minn. June 6, 1990)
  • Robert v. Zygmunt 652 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • Robert v. Zygmunt 652 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
    “A very severe disparity between the parties is required to sustain a finding of unfair hardship necessary to apportion nonmarital property.” review denied (Minn. June 6, 1990).
  • Grigsby v. Grigsby 648 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • Grigsby v. Grigsby 648 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
    (holding that the recovery for noneconomic damages, such as pain and suffering, and for future economic damages, such as future wage losses, future loss of earning capacity or future medical expenses, are nonmarital), review denied (Minn. June 6, 1990); (Minn.
  • Marriage of Swanson v. Swanson 583 N.W.2d 15 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
  • Marriage of Swanson v. Swanson 583 N.W.2d 15 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
    review denied (Minn. June 6, 1990).
  • Marriage of Reynolds v. Reynolds 498 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • Marriage of Reynolds v. Reynolds 498 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 1993