Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Haggerty, 448 N.W.2d 363.

240 citing documents.

  • State v. Serena 673 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Serena 673 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
    “Minnesota statutes are presumed constitutional, and our power to declare a statute unconstitutional should be exercised with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.”
  • State v. Blooflat 671 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. Blooflat 671 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. McCoy 668 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. McCoy 668 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
    Minnesota statutes are presumed constitutional, and the power of the appellate courts to declare a statute unconstitutional “should be exercised with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.” (citation omitted).
  • Granville v. Minneapolis Public Schools, Special School District No. 1 668 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • Granville v. Minneapolis Public Schools, Special School District No. 1 668 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
    Minnesota statutes enjoy a presumption of constitutionality, and we exercise our power to declare a statute unconstitutional “with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.”
  • Doe v. F.P., Diocese of Winona 667 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • Doe v. F.P., Diocese of Winona 667 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. Fingal 666 N.W.2d 420 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. Fingal 666 N.W.2d 420 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. Cunningham 663 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. Cunningham 663 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
    “Minnesota statutes are presumed constitutional, and our power to declare a statute unconstitutional should be exercised with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.” (citation omitted).
  • State v. Manypenny 662 N.W.2d 183 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. Manypenny 662 N.W.2d 183 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
    “Minnesota statutes are presumed constitutional, and our power to declare a statute unconstitutional should be exercised with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.” (citation omitted).
  • State v. Grillo 661 N.W.2d 641 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. Grillo 661 N.W.2d 641 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
    “Minnesota statutes are presumed constitutional and” will be declared unconstitutional “only when absolutely necessary.” (citing City of Richfield v. Local No. 1215, ).
  • State v. Gresser 657 N.W.2d 875 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. Gresser 657 N.W.2d 875 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • In re P.T. 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • In Re PT 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • In re P.T. 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
    “Minnesota statutes are presumed constitutional, and our power to declare a statute unconstitutional should be exercised with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.” (citation omitted).
  • In Re PT 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. McLellan 655 N.W.2d 669 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. McLellan 655 N.W.2d 669 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. Schluter 653 N.W.2d 787 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • State v. Schluter 653 N.W.2d 787 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
    Minnesota statutes are presumed constitutional and will be declared unconstitutional “only when absolutely necessary.” (citing City of Richfield v. Local No. 1215, ).
  • State v. Larivee 644 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • State v. Larivee 644 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
    “Minnesota statutes are presumed constitutional, and our power to declare a statute unconstitutional should be exercised with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.” (citation omitted).
  • State v. Henning 644 N.W.2d 500 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • State v. Henning 644 N.W.2d 500 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • State Ex Rel. Hatch v. Employers Insurance of Wausau 644 N.W.2d 820 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • State Ex Rel. Hatch v. Employers Insurance of Wausau 644 N.W.2d 820 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
    “Minnesota statutes are presumed constitutional, and our power to declare a statute unconstitutional should be exercised with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.” (citation omitted).
  • In Re Kindschy 634 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • In Re Kindschy 634 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • Everything Etched, Inc. v. Shakopee Towing, Inc. 634 N.W.2d 450 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • Everything Etched, Inc. v. Shakopee Towing, Inc. 634 N.W.2d 450 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    Further, “our power to declare a statute unconstitutional should be exercised with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.” (citation omitted).
  • State v. Frazier 631 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Frazier 631 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    “Minnesota statutes are presumed constitutional, and our power to declare a statute unconstitutional should be exercised with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.” (citation omitted)
  • State v. Pearson 633 N.W.2d 81 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Pearson 633 N.W.2d 81 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    “Minnesota statutes are presumed constitutional, and our power to declare a statute unconstitutional should be exercised with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.” (citation omitted).
  • Piche v. Independent School District No. 621 634 N.W.2d 193 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • Piche v. Independent School District No. 621 634 N.W.2d 193 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    “Minnesota statutes are presumed constitutional, and our power to declare a statute unconstitutional should be exercised with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.” (citation omitted).
  • Defenders of Wildlife v. Ventura 632 N.W.2d 707 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • Defenders of Wildlife v. Ventura 632 N.W.2d 707 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    Minnesota statutes are presumed constitutional and are declared unconstitutional only “with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.” (citation omitted).
  • In Re the June 9, 2000 Fence Viewing Petition of Bailey 626 N.W.2d 190 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • In Re the June 9, 2000 Fence Viewing Petition of Bailey 626 N.W.2d 190 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    “Minnesota statutes are presumed constitutional, and our power to declare a statute unconstitutional should be exercised with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.” (citation omitted).
  • Walker v. Itasca County Auditor 624 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • Walker v. Itasca County Auditor 624 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    State statutes receive the benefit of a presumption of constitutionality, and the judicial power “to declare a statute unconstitutional should be exercised with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.” (citation omitted).