Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Shorter v. State, 511 N.W.2d 743.

62 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See, -47 (Minn. 1994) (determining that the “highly unusual” facts of the case justified plea withdrawal when defense counsel only asked leading questions, the district court failed to ask follow-up questions, and police officers were prepared to testify that the investigation was incomplete and there had been a po
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
First, arguing that the supreme court in that case “revers[ed] the defendant’s plea where several procedural irregularities, in addition to a leading factual basis, rendered the defendant’s plea suspect.” Randall is correct that the supreme court permitted Shorter to withdraw his plea, but it did so for man
State of Minnesota v. Sylvester Jones 7 N.W.3d 391 Minn. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Sylvester Jones 7 N.W.3d 391 Minn. 2024
Id.; 7 d 743, 744–45, 747 (Minn. 1994); Ecker, d at 717; d 852, 860 (Minn. 2016).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
We are not otherwise persuaded by Becklund’s in which the supreme court ordered the district court to grant the defendant’s motion to withdraw their guilty plea when there were a “number of procedural irregularities present,” including the use of leading questions.
Deontranelle Leslie Davis, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Davis did not challenge the validity of his guilty plea, to support his assertion that this new information creates a manifest injustice warranting plea withdrawal.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
6 Cuffy argues that his pleas are inaccurate because , although they included admissions regarding each and every essential element of the offense, they lacked “sufficient detail” to permit the district court to determine guilt.1 Cuffy relies on two cases for this argument: State v. Hoaglund , and Shorter v. State
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Shorter v. State , 746 (Minn. 1994) (reversing postconviction court and remanding where factual basis was established solely on leading questions and the police department found exculpatory evidence after the plea, admitting that the original investigation was incomplete ); State v. Hoaglund , -5 (Minn. 1976) (c
A19-0218 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Edward Everett Urbanek. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(reversing and remanding for trial because of “procedural irregularities” under the supreme court’s supervisory powers as necessary to ensure the appearance of justice).
Erick Lamont Lindsey, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
8 First, in arguing that leading qu estions rendered his plea inac curate
Gary Lee Johnson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
The supreme court’s decision in Shorter v. State , , guides our analysis .
State v. Nicholas 924 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Nicholas 924 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
746 (Minn. 1994) (emphasis added).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
When a district court grants a defendant’s plea-withdrawal motion, the court “remove[s] the barrier of his plea and allow[s] him a tr ial.” d 743, 747 (Minn. 1994).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Mikulak 903 N.W.2d 600 Minn. 2017
State v. Mikulak 903 N.W.2d 600 Minn. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
6 “[T]he trial court bears the primary responsibility to advise and interrogate the defendant in sufficient detail to establish an adequate factual basis for the plea.”
State of Minnesota v. Mark Christian Wolhowe Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Mark Christian Wolhowe Minn. Ct. App. 2016
He maintains that his plea is therefore invalid
Darek Jon Nelson v. State of Minnesota 880 N.W.2d 852 Minn. 2016
Darek Jon Nelson v. State of Minnesota 880 N.W.2d 852 Minn. 2016
Raleigh, d at 94-95; -45, 747 (Minn. 1994); State v. Hoaglund, 307 Minn. 322, 326
Phillip Anthony Roberts v. State of Minnesota 856 N.W.2d 287 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Phillip Anthony Roberts v. State of Minnesota 856 N.W.2d 287 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
We are guided by the supreme court’s
Chambers v. State 831 N.W.2d 311 Minn. 2013
State v. Beecroft 813 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 2012
State v. Beecroft 813 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 2012
And our concern over convicting an innocent defendant has led us to say that “a prosecutor may not seek a conviction at any price.” Ramey, d at 300 (-63 (Minn.1995)); (“ ‘[Justice must satisfy the appearance of justice.’ ” (quoting Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11, 14 , 75 S.Ct.
State v. Lopez 794 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Lopez 794 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Lessley 779 N.W.2d 825 Minn. 2010
State v. Raleigh 778 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 2010
State v. Farnsworth 738 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 2007
State v. Farnsworth 738 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 2007
Munger v. State 737 N.W.2d 604 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Munger v. State 737 N.W.2d 604 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Opsahl v. State 710 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 2006
Opsahl v. State 710 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 2006
” (quoting Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11, 14 , 75 S.Ct.
Pederson v. State 649 N.W.2d 161 Minn. 2002
Pederson v. State 649 N.W.2d 161 Minn. 2002
3 In considering Pederson’s due process claim, we are mindful that “ ‘justice must satisfy the appearance of justice.’ ” (quoting Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11, 14 , 75 S.Ct.
Santiago v. State 644 N.W.2d 425 Minn. 2002
Santiago v. State 644 N.W.2d 425 Minn. 2002
See, -46 (Minn.1994) (explaining that defense attorney made proffer as to the testimony of witnesses and court refused to hear testimony and permitted only argument from counsel); (holding that defense counsel’s memorandum summarizing expected testimony of a witness was
Kaiser v. State 641 N.W.2d 900 Minn. 2002
Kaiser v. State 641 N.W.2d 900 Minn. 2002
Kaiser v. State 621 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Kaiser v. State 621 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Jumping Eagle 602 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Jumping Eagle 602 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 1999