Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Odenthal v. Minnesota Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists, 649 N.W.2d 426.

43 citing documents.

Friends to Restore St. Mary's, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
at 536 -37 (c iting Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602, 612 -13, 91 S. Ct. 2105, 2111 (1971) (holding that a state action must have a secular legislative purpose, must neither inhibit nor advance religion in its primary effect, and must not foster excessive governmental ent anglement with religion ); Odenthal v. Minn. Conference of Seventh -Day Adventists, ).
Meeker County, petitioner, Respondent, Victoria Lynn Moreno, n/k/a Victoria Lynn Baalson, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
of Seventh-Day Adventists
Presbytery of the Twin Cities Area, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Under the entanglement doctrine, a state may not inquire into or review the internal decisionmaking or governance of a religious institution.” Odenthal v. Minn. Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists
United Islamic Society v. Masjed Abubakr Al-Seddiq, Inc., and In the Matter of the: Putative Charitable Trust for … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
United Islamic Society v. Masjed Abubakr Al-Seddiq, Inc., and In the Matter of the: Putative Charitable Trust for … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Under the entanglement doctrine, a state may not inquire into or review the internal decisionmaking or governance of a religious institution.”
Pastor David Bacon, Pastor Timothy Hepner, Ruth Dold, and Sharon Hvam, individually and as representatives of a class … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Pastor David Bacon, Pastor Timothy Hepner, Ruth Dold, and Sharon Hvam, individually and as representatives of a class … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
LaVonne Pfeil, Individually and as Trustee for Heirs of Henry Pfeil v. St. Matthews Evangelical Lutheran Church of … 877 N.W.2d 528 Minn. 2016
LaVonne Pfeil, Individually and as Trustee for Heirs of Henry Pfeil v. St. Matthews Evangelical Lutheran Church of … 877 N.W.2d 528 Minn. 2016
LaVonne Pfeil, Individually and as Trustee for Heirs of Henry Pfeil v. St. Matthews Evangelical Lutheran Church of … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
LaVonne Pfeil, Individually and as Trustee for Heirs of Henry Pfeil v. St. Matthews Evangelical Lutheran Church of … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The third prong of the Lemon test, excessive entanglement, prohibits a court from inquiring into or reviewing “the internal decisionmaking or governance of a religious institution.”
Citizens State Bank Norwood Young America v. Gordon Brown 849 N.W.2d 55 Minn. 2014
Citizens State Bank Norwood Young America v. Gordon Brown 849 N.W.2d 55 Minn. 2014
State v. Wenthe 839 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 2013
State v. Wenthe 839 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 2013
Under this prong, “a state may not inquire into or review the internal decisionmaking or governance of a religious institution.” (citing Jones v. Wolf, 443 U.S. 595, 602, 99 S.Ct.
ADVANCED DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC. v. Jaime 774 N.W.2d 176 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
ADVANCED DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC. v. Jaime 774 N.W.2d 176 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Bussmann 741 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 2007
State v. Bussmann 741 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 2007
To avoid excessive government entanglement, “a state may not inquire into or review the internal decisionmaking or governance of a religious institution.” (citing Jones v. Wolf, 443 U.S. 595, 602 , 99 S.Ct.
C.B. ex rel. L.B. v. Evangelical Lutheran Church in America 726 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
CB Ex Rel. LB v. EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN 726 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
CB Ex Rel. LB v. EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN 726 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
C.B. ex rel. L.B. v. Evangelical Lutheran Church in America 726 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Stringer v. Minnesota Vikings Football Club, LLC 705 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 2005
Stringer v. Minnesota Vikings Football Club, LLC 705 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 2005
of Seventh-Day Adventists, Minn. R. Civ.
Doe v. Lutheran High School of Greater Minneapolis 702 N.W.2d 322 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Doe v. Lutheran High School of Greater Minneapolis 702 N.W.2d 322 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Egan v. Hamline United Methodist Church 679 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Egan v. Hamline United Methodist Church 679 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
(statutory interpretation); (subject matter jurisdiction).
Rooney v. Rooney 669 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Rooney v. Rooney 669 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
at 3025 ; (applying neutral principles test to negligent counseling claim against member of clergy).
Eisenschenk v. Eisenschenk 668 N.W.2d 235 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Eisenschenk v. Eisenschenk 668 N.W.2d 235 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(reciting this rule in context of expedited child-support process).
Doe v. F.P., Diocese of Winona 667 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Doe v. F.P., Diocese of Winona 667 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
“ ‘Unlicensed mental health practitioner’ * * * includes ⅜ ⅜ * (3) clergy who are providing mental health services that are equivalent to those defined in subdivision 4.” (quoting Minn.Stat.
Johns v. Harborage I, Ltd. 664 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 2003
Johns v. Harborage I, Ltd. 664 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 2003
Olson v. First Church of Nazarene 661 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Olson v. First Church of Nazarene 661 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
J.M. v. Minnesota District Council of the Assemblies of God 658 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
J.M. v. Minnesota District Council of the Assemblies of God 658 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Odenthal v. Minnesota Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists 657 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Odenthal v. Minnesota Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists 657 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 2003