Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Sanborn Manufacturing Co. v. Currie, 500 N.W.2d 161.

25 citing documents.

Douglas J. Malark, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
d 161, 163 (Minn. App. 1993).
The Estate of Michael T. Conneran, Jr., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Rodrigo Esparza, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Wells Fargo Insurance Services USA, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(noting that where a res trictive covenant is not ancillary to new employment, it must be supported by independent consideration to be enforceable).
Irv’s Boomin’ Fireworks, LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
AutoUpLink Technologies, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Safety Center, Inc. v. Stier 903 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Safety Center, Inc. v. Stier 903 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
v. Currie, - 65 (Minn. App. 1993) (“Trial courts have the discretion to balance the factors of irreparable harm and likelihood of success on the merits.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Brad Ronald Stevens. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Joshua Royce Holmquist. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Joshua Royce Holmquist. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-65 (Minn. App. 1993) (affirming denial of temporary injunction where party showed no likelihood of success on the merits).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Brad Ronald Stevens. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Advance Contract Equipment and Design LC, d/b/a, Rapids Foodservice Contract and Design v. Kevin LaMere, Horizon Equipment LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Advance Contract Equipment and Design LC, d/b/a, Rapids Foodservice Contract and Design v. Kevin LaMere, Horizon Equipment LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. FLS Transportation, Inc. 772 N.W.2d 528 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. FLS Transportation, Inc. 772 N.W.2d 528 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. Minnesota Twins Partnership 638 N.W.2d 214 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. Minnesota Twins Partnership 638 N.W.2d 214 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Michels v. Kozitza 610 N.W.2d 368 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Michels v. Kozitza 610 N.W.2d 368 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
(stating prospect for balancing considerations does not exist where plaintiff has shown no likelihood that it will win its case); (stating where appellant argues merits of case, appellate court limited “to determining whether the prelim
Midwest Sports Marketing, Inc. v. Hillerich & Bradsby of Canada, Ltd. 552 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Midwest Sports Marketing, Inc. v. Hillerich & Bradsby of Canada, Ltd. 552 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Ecolab, Inc. v. Gartland 537 N.W.2d 291 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Ecolab, Inc. v. Gartland 537 N.W.2d 291 Minn. Ct. App. 1995