Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Morlock v. St. Paul Guardian Insurance Co., 650 N.W.2d 154.

45 citing documents.

Robyn Johnson, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Maria Olson, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Co., d 154, 159 (Minn. 2002).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Sidney Phillip Monette Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Sidney Phillip Monette Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Alvin Glay, trustee for the next of kin of Unity McGill v. R.C. of St. Cloud, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Alvin Glay, trustee for the next of kin of Unity McGill v. R.C. of St. Cloud, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Co., (“A new trial is also required if the instruction was erroneous and its effect cannot be determined.”).
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Scott Gunderson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Scott Gunderson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Co., d 154, 159 (Minn. 2002), but jury instructions that allow for the possibility of significant disagreement among jury members as to the specific act committed violates a defendant’s right to a unanimous verdict, Stempf, d at 354.
Chad Monson, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Jonathan G. Foss, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
James David Stemm d/b/a Principle Personnel Group, plaintiff, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Eric Berg, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Co. , d 154, 159 (Minn. 2002).
Michael Nassif, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Co., (noting that we allow district courts “considerable latitude in selecting language used in the jury charge and determining the propriety of a specific instru ction”).
Laurie Jatho, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Billie V. Darkenwald Revocable Trust, dated January 21, 1983, restated February 5, 1999, as amended, … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Co., d 154, 159 (Minn. 2002), and denying a motion for a new trial on the ground of erroneous jury instruction rests within the district court ’s discretion.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Sean Rand, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Heather Jones, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Anthony Patrick Huber, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Jacquelyn Bliss, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
William P. Brady, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Amy Andrea Horsfield Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Amy Andrea Horsfield Minn. Ct. App. 2015
RKL Landholdings, LLC v. Seneca Specialty Insurance Company, 1563 University Ave, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
RKL Landholdings, LLC v. Seneca Specialty Insurance Company, 1563 University Ave, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jovani Nassar v. Fady Chamoun Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Jovani Nassar v. Fady Chamoun Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Daly v. McFarland 812 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 2012
Daly v. McFarland 812 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 2012
Ram Mutual Insurance Co. v. Meyer 768 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Ram Mutual Insurance Co. v. Meyer 768 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Co., (providing district courts broad discretion in drafting special verdict questions), review denied (Minn. June 27, 2000).
George v. Estate of Baker 724 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2006
George v. Estate of Baker 724 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2006
Co., (“A new trial is also required if the instruction was erroneous and its effect cannot be determined.”).
Youngquist v. WESTERN NAT. MUT. INS. CO. 716 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Youngquist v. WESTERN NAT. MUT. INS. CO. 716 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Rowe v. Munye 702 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 2005
Heine v. Simon 702 N.W.2d 752 Minn. 2005
Rowe v. Munye 702 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 2005
Heine v. Simon 702 N.W.2d 752 Minn. 2005
Bolander v. Bolander 703 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Bolander v. Bolander 703 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Rowe v. Munye 674 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Rowe v. Munye 674 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Co., -72 (Minn.App.2001), rev’d (holding that facts did not warrant instruction which even if erroneous, was not prejudicial).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by