DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Rutten v. Rutten, 347 N.W.2d 47.

510 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Jacqueline Lorraine Bourgoin v. Bradley Joseph Bourgoin, County of Anoka, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Jean Rucker v. Kraig Vernon Rucker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Jean Rucker v. Kraig Vernon Rucker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Beth Ostergaard Stillwell v. Harry Alan Stillwell Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Beth Ostergaard Stillwell v. Harry Alan Stillwell Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Marriage of: Robert Peter Crowley v. Bridget Marie Meyer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Marriage of: Robert Peter Crowley v. Bridget Marie Meyer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. B., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. B., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: M. A. K. and A. L. P., Sr., … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: M. A. K. and A. L. P., Sr., … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(noting that clearly erroneous findings and a misapplication of law constitute an abuse of discretion); d 47, 50 (Minn. 1984) (stating that resolving matter in manner contrary to logic and facts on record constitutes abuse of discretion).
Kathryn Suzanne Neufeld, f/k/a Kathryn Suzanne Hare v. Robert Russell Hare Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Kathryn Suzanne Neufeld, f/k/a Kathryn Suzanne Hare v. Robert Russell Hare Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: James Walter Shaw v. Barbara Ann Shaw Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: James Walter Shaw v. Barbara Ann Shaw Minn. Ct. App. 2016
A determination 12 by the district court must be “against logic and the facts on record before this court will find that the [district] court abused its discretion.”
In re the Marriage of: Janelle M. Schires v. Vernon D. Schires Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Janelle M. Schires v. Vernon D. Schires Minn. Ct. App. 2016
A determination by the district court must be “against logic and the facts on record before this court will find that the [district] court abused its discretion.”
In Re the Custody of: A. J. O. David Ortiz v. Sarah Judith Un Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In Re the Custody of: A. J. O. David Ortiz v. Sarah Judith Un Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Custody of WNM: Peter Edward Marxen v. Janet Ruth Jacobs Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Custody of WNM: Peter Edward Marxen v. Janet Ruth Jacobs Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Alyssa Aileen Rex, f/k/a Alyssa Aileen Nicoski v. Steven Edward Nicoski Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Tarah Ann Aanerud v. James Richard Aanerud Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Alyssa Aileen Rex, f/k/a Alyssa Aileen Nicoski v. Steven Edward Nicoski Minn. Ct. App. 2015
n.3 (Minn. 1997) (findings unsupported by the record; misapplying the law); (resolving the matter in a manner contrary to logic and facts on the record).
In re the Marriage of: Tarah Ann Aanerud v. James Richard Aanerud Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A district court’s resolution of a question must be “against logic and the facts on record before [an appellate] court will find that the trial court abused its discretion.”
In re the Marriage of: Jennifer Lee Hedberg v. Benjamin Carl Hedberg, County of Chisago, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Jennifer Lee Hedberg v. Benjamin Carl Hedberg, County of Chisago, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(Minn. 1 The district court also ordered father to contribute to the cost of childcare and health insurance.
In re the Marriage of: Christina Marie Rexine v. Joey Lee Rexine Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Christina Marie Rexine v. Joey Lee Rexine Minn. Ct. App. 2015
When dividing property, a district court abuses its discretion if it resolves the matter in a manner “that is against logic and the facts on record.”
In re the Marriage of: Charles DeBolt Hart v. Jennifer Jayne Hart Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Charles DeBolt Hart v. Jennifer Jayne Hart Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Nicole Ruth Sela v. Amit Yitzhak Sela Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Nicole Ruth Sela v. Amit Yitzhak Sela Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A district court abuses its discretion in dividing property if it resolves the matter in a manner “that is against logic and the facts on the record.”
In re the Marriage of: Mary Patricia Myhre v. Steven Kenneth Myhre Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Mary Patricia Myhre v. Steven Kenneth Myhre Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“There must be a clearly erroneous conclusion that is against logic and the facts on record before [an appellate] court will find that the [district] court abused its discretion.”
In re the Marriage of: Jo Ellen M. Healy v. John Henry Healy, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ramsey County, A. L. A. v. E. v. S. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ramsey County, A. L. A. v. E. v. S. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Jo Ellen M. Healy v. John Henry Healy, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The district court abuses its discretion when it resolves the matter in a manner that is “against logic and the facts on [the] record.”
In re the Marriage of: Anthony Linus Orner v. Shauna Orner Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Anthony Linus Orner v. Shauna Orner Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: James Donald Knight v. Maria Pieternella Knight Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: James Donald Knight v. Maria Pieternella Knight Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(stating that a district 17 court abuses its discretion in dividing property if it resolves the matter in a manner “that is against logic and the facts on record”).
In re the Marriage of: Stacy Elizabeth Reeves v. Brian Lawrence Reeves, Hennepin County, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Margie Ann Nelson v. Merlin Berdeen Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Stacy Elizabeth Reeves v. Brian Lawrence Reeves, Hennepin County, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Margie Ann Nelson v. Merlin Berdeen Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(stating that a district court abuses its discretion when a conclusion is against logic and the facts in the record).
In re the Marriage of: Gregory Ross Wickenhauser v. Denise Esther Wickenhauser, n/k/a Denise Esther Peterson, (A14-0417), and … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Gregory Ross Wickenhauser v. Denise Esther Wickenhauser, n/k/a Denise Esther Peterson, (A14-0417), and … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
When dividing property, a district court abuses its discretion when it resolves the matter in a manner “that is against logic and the facts on record.”
In re the Marriage of: Larry Joe Bolton v. Susan Mary Bolton Minn. Ct. App. 2015