Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Rutten v. Rutten, 347 N.W.2d 47.

513 citing documents.

Myles John Sterling Mankus v. Melanie Marie Warren Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Dia Eldin Jubara v. Nihad Salah Awad Hamed Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A district court abuses its discretion in dividing property if it resolves the matter in a manner “that is against logic and the facts on record.”
In re the Marriage of: Lisa Marie Kent v. Brenton Jackson Kent Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Kristine Ann Spratt Hansen, n/k/a Kristine Ann Spratt v. Christopher Patrick Hansen Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Francis Stephen Gill v. Gretchen Zwakman Gill Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A district court abuses its discretion in dividing property if it resolves the matter in a manner “that is against logic and the facts on record.”
In re the Marriage of: Julia Loxley Hynnek n/k/a Julia Loxley Kaemmer v. Eric Martin Hynnek Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: James Warren Huerd v. Wanda Sue Huerd Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Matter of: Susan Kelly Lynn v. Christopher James Greenfield Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Donald William McIsaac v. Nadine S. Roberts Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A district court abuses its discretion in dividing property if it resolves the matter in a manner “that is against logic and the facts on record.”
In re the Custody of: R. T. R., C. T. R., and S. C. T. R., Robby Romero … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Peder Kristian Rogich v. Denise Lynn Rogich Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A district court abuses its discretion in dividing property if it resolves the matter in a manner “that is against logic and facts on the record.” Rutten v. Rutten
In the Matter of: Tamara Lynn Kriesel v. Michael James Rossman Minn. Ct. App. 2019
We will uphold a district court’s determination of child support unless it is “against logic and the facts on record.”
In re the Matter of: Ronald Joseph Claeson v. Florence Marie Denais Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Diana Lynne Neumann, n/k/a Diana Lynne deVries v. Harvey Mark Neumann Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Marie Tiedke, nka Kathleen Marie Freitag v. Alex Lee Tiedke Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A district court abuses its discretion in dividing property if it resolves the matter in a manner “that is against logic and the facts on record.” Rutten v. Rutten , see also Sirek v. Sirek , d 896, 898 (Minn. App. 2005).
In re the Marriage of: Thomas M. Dillahunt v. Tami L. Mitchell, f/k/a Tami L. Dillahunt Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A district cour t abuses its discretion in dividing property if it resolves the matter in a manner “that is against logic and the facts on record.”
In the Marriage of: Deborah J. Schmitt v. Paul N. Schmitt Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Marie Wilson v. Todd Joseph Wilson Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A district court abuses its discretion in dividing property if it resolves the matter in a manner “that is against logic an d the facts on record.”
In re the Marriage of: Amy Alyssa Post v. Samuel Morton Post, III Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A district court abuses its discretion in dividing property if it resolves the matter in a manner “that i s against logic and the facts on record.”
In Re the Marriage of: Donald M. Charlson (A18-1058) (A18-1065) v. Angela K. Charlson (A18-1058) (A18-1065) Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Laurie S. Morris Hiniker a/k/a Laurie Suzette Morris v. Robert Lee Hiniker Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A district 6 court abuses its discretion when its resolution of the matter is “against logic and the facts on record.”
In re the Marriage of: Gregory Joseph Parnell v. Christine Melanie Parnell Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A district court abuses its discretion if it resolves a maintenance issue in a manner that is “against logic and the facts on the record,” , misapplies the law, or makes findings of fact that are unsupported by the record , d 199, 202 (Minn. 1997).
Eric Joseph Vacko v. Teri Ann Shults, County of Anoka, Intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Mechelle M. Lund v. Jeffrey W. Lund Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re G. J. Parents F. 920 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re G. J. Parents F. 920 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Rutten v. Rutten , , 50 (Minn. 1984) ("There must be a clearly erroneous conclusion that is against logic and the facts on record before this court will find that the trial court abused its discretion.").
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A. M. C. and G. J. F., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(“There must be a clearly erroneous conclusion that is against logic and the facts on record before this court will find that the trial court abused its discretion.”).
In re the Marriage of: Robert Joseph Hoolihan v. Jacqueline Ann Hoolihan Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A district court abuses its discretion when it resolves the matter in a manner that is “against logic and the facts on record.”
Paul Thomas Hesse v. Toni Renee Wingrove Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In the Matter of: Natasha June Marie Courtney v. Barry Ishmael McReynolds Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: R.K., Parent Minn. Ct. App. 2017
County of Anoka, Abang Simon Adam v. Menasa Cham Adom Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: N. L. and C. S., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Patricia Rose Whipps v. Richard Cordell Whipps Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Rutten v. Rutten , Sirek v. Sirek
In re the Marriage of: Brent Lee Florine v. Lauren Marie Florine Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A district court abuses its discretion if its decision “is against logic and the facts on record.”
In re the Marriage of: Alexander K. Antzaras v. Triantafilia Rose Moshou-Antzaras Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A district court abuses its discretion in dividing property if it resolves the matter in a manner “that is against logic and the facts on record.” Rutten v. Rutten
In re the Marriage of: Dawn Angela Swenson, f/k/a Dawn Angela Pedri v. Shawn Anthony Pedri, and County … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A district court has broad discretion in determining child support and we will reverse for abuse of discretion only if it resolves the question in a manner “that is against logic and the facts on record.”
In re the Marriage of: Glenn Alan LaTour v. Nancy Jean LaTour Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A district court abuses its discretion in dividing property if it resolves the matter in a manner “that is against logic and the facts on record.” Rutten v. Rutten
In re the Marriage of: Andrew Scott Green v. Julie Ann Green Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A district court abuses its discretion if it divides marital property in a manner “that is against logic and the facts on record.”
In re the Marriage of: Jennifer Kristin Gorney v. Keith Joseph Gorney Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A district court abuses its discretion when its conclusion is “against logic and the facts on record.”
In re the Marriage of: Mary Ann Fenlon v. Steven Robert Fenlon Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Sharon Elizabeth Anderson v. William Thomas Anderson, and County of Dakota, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2017
d 373, 378 (Minn. App. 2011).
In re the Marriage of: Julie M. Steen v. Keven L. Steen Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A17-0353 In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. A. G. and J. E. C., … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Christensen v. Healey 899 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Christensen v. Healey 899 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(“The focus in granting [parenting time] is primarily the best interests of the children.”); (Minn.App.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: M. D. R. and K. E. B., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2017
1997) (noting that clearly erroneous findings and misapplication of law constitute abuse of discretion); Rutten v. Rutten , (s tating that resolving matter in manner contrary to logic and facts on the record cons titutes abuse of discretion).
In re the Marriage of: Rebecca Lynn McNeil v. Mark Aaron McNeil Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Wakisha Nicole Fortwengler, n/k/a Alexa Nicole Schultz v. Chad Michael Fortwengler Minn. Ct. App. 2017
d 373, 378 (Minn. App. 2011).
In re the Marriage of: Heather Lee Burke v. Thomas Joseph Burke, County of Otter Tail, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2017

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by