Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Rutten v. Rutten, 347 N.W.2d 47.

510 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Kristine Ann Spratt Hansen, n/k/a Kristine Ann Spratt, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Francis Stephen Gill, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A district court abuses its discretion in dividing property if it resolves the matter in a manner “that is against logic and the facts on record.”
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: James Warren Huerd, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Matter of: Susan Kelly Lynn, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Donald William McIsaac, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A district court abuses its discretion in dividing property if it resolves the matter in a manner “that is against logic and the facts on record.”
In re the Custody of: R. T. R., C. T. R., and S. C. T. R., Robby Romero, … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A district court abuses its discretion in dividing property if it resolves the matter in a manner “that is against logic and facts on the record.” Rutten v. Rutten
In the Matter of: Tamara Lynn Kriesel, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
We will uphold a district court’s determination of child support unless it is “against logic and the facts on record.”
, A18-1594 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Diana Lynne Neumann, n/k/a Diana Lynne deVries, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Marie Tiedke, nka Kathleen Marie Freitag, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A district court abuses its discretion in dividing property if it resolves the matter in a manner “that is against logic and the facts on record.” Rutten v. Rutten , see also Sirek v. Sirek , d 896, 898 (Minn. App. 2005).
In re the Marriage of: Thomas M. Dillahunt, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A district cour t abuses its discretion in dividing property if it resolves the matter in a manner “that is against logic and the facts on record.”
In the Marriage of: Deborah J. Schmitt, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A district court abuses its discretion in dividing property if it resolves the matter in a manner “that is against logic an d the facts on record.”
In re the Marriage of: Amy Alyssa Post, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A district court abuses its discretion in dividing property if it resolves the matter in a manner “that i s against logic and the facts on record.”
A18-1065 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Laurie S. Morris Hiniker a/k/a Laurie Suzette Morris, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A district 6 court abuses its discretion when its resolution of the matter is “against logic and the facts on record.”
In re the Marriage of: Gregory Joseph Parnell, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A district court abuses its discretion if it resolves a maintenance issue in a manner that is “against logic and the facts on the record,” , misapplies the law, or makes findings of fact that are unsupported by the record , d 199, 202 (Minn. 1997).
Eric Joseph Vacko, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Mechelle M. Lund, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re G. J. Parents F. 920 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re G. J. Parents F. 920 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Rutten v. Rutten , , 50 (Minn. 1984) ("There must be a clearly erroneous conclusion that is against logic and the facts on record before this court will find that the trial court abused its discretion.").
A18-0333 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(“There must be a clearly erroneous conclusion that is against logic and the facts on record before this court will find that the trial court abused its discretion.”).
In re the Marriage of: Robert Joseph Hoolihan, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A district court abuses its discretion when it resolves the matter in a manner that is “against logic and the facts on record.”
Paul Thomas Hesse, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In the Matter of: Natasha June Marie Courtney, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: R.K., Parent Minn. Ct. App. 2017
County of Anoka, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: N. L. and C. S., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Patricia Rose Whipps, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Rutten v. Rutten , Sirek v. Sirek
In re the Marriage of: Brent Lee Florine, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A district court abuses its discretion if its decision “is against logic and the facts on record.”
A17-0300 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A district court abuses its discretion in dividing property if it resolves the matter in a manner “that is against logic and the facts on record.” Rutten v. Rutten
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A district court has broad discretion in determining child support and we will reverse for abuse of discretion only if it resolves the question in a manner “that is against logic and the facts on record.”
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A district court abuses its discretion in dividing property if it resolves the matter in a manner “that is against logic and the facts on record.” Rutten v. Rutten
In re the Marriage of: Mary Ann Fenlon, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Andrew Scott Green, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A district court abuses its discretion if it divides marital property in a manner “that is against logic and the facts on record.”
In re the Marriage of: Jennifer Kristin Gorney, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A district court abuses its discretion when its conclusion is “against logic and the facts on record.”
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
d 373, 378 (Minn. App. 2011).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A17-0352 A17-0353 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Christensen v. Healey 899 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Christensen v. Healey 899 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(“The focus in granting [parenting time] is primarily the best interests of the children.”); (Minn.App.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: M. D. R. and K. E. B., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2017
1997) (noting that clearly erroneous findings and misapplication of law constitute abuse of discretion); Rutten v. Rutten , (s tating that resolving matter in manner contrary to logic and facts on the record cons titutes abuse of discretion).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Wakisha Nicole Fortwengler, n/k/a Alexa Nicole Schultz, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
d 373, 378 (Minn. App. 2011).
In re the Marriage of: Heather Lee Burke, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Matter of: Birch Benjamin Hansen v. Suzanne Christine Todnem 891 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Matter of: Birch Benjamin Hansen v. Suzanne Christine Todnem 891 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Jacqueline Lorraine Bourgoin v. Bradley Joseph Bourgoin, County of Anoka, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2017

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by