Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Taflin v. Taflin, 366 N.W.2d 315.

48 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
The district court must evaluate the totality of the children’s circumstances based on the “present environment,” which means the last “judicially approved environment.”
In re the Matter of: Peter H. Stier, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
15, 2002); (stating, in a child -support dispute, that “[t]his court will not engage in speculation and the father will not be heard to complain when he has failed to provide this court with a reviewable record”).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Michael Charles Sasse, f/k/a Michael Charles Sasse Penkert v. Kathryn Elizabeth Penkert, f/k/a Delight Bernice Penkert Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Michael Charles Sasse, f/k/a Michael Charles Sasse Penkert v. Kathryn Elizabeth Penkert, f/k/a Delight Bernice Penkert Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“This court will not engage in speculation and [appellant] will not be heard to complain when he has failed to provide this court with a reviewable record.”
Eisenschenk v. Eisenschenk 668 N.W.2d 235 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Eisenschenk v. Eisenschenk 668 N.W.2d 235 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(reciting this rule in maintenance-modification context); (reciting this rule in support-modification context).
In Re Marriage of Crockarell 631 N.W.2d 829 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re Marriage of Crockarell 631 N.W.2d 829 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
("taxable income is not always a reliable indication of net income" for support purposes (citation omitted)); (party who failed to submit evidence to support his claim before district court could not object to district court's findings on appeal).
Geibe v. Geibe 571 N.W.2d 774 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Geibe v. Geibe 571 N.W.2d 774 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Rouland v. Thorson 542 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Rouland v. Thorson 542 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
(support obligor could not complain about district court's failure to reduce his support obligation where obligor failed to produce reviewable record on issue).
Franzen v. Borders 521 N.W.2d 626 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Franzen v. Borders 521 N.W.2d 626 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
We will not engage in speculation, and a support obligor “will not be heard to complain [about child support] when he has faded to provide this court with a reviewable record.”
Marriage of Allan v. Allan 509 N.W.2d 593 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Marriage of Allan v. Allan 509 N.W.2d 593 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
(party who failed to submit evidence to support his claim before district court could not object to district court’s findings on appeal).
Marriage of Harkema v. Harkema 474 N.W.2d 10 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Harkema v. Harkema 474 N.W.2d 10 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Lilleboe v. Lilleboe 453 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Marriage of Lilleboe v. Lilleboe 453 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Roehrdanz v. Roehrdanz 438 N.W.2d 687 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Roehrdanz v. Roehrdanz 438 N.W.2d 687 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Douglas County Child Support Enforcement Unit v. Cavegn 420 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Sefkow v. Sefkow 413 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Sefkow v. Sefkow 413 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-93 (Minn.Ct.App.1985) (evidence that mother’s male friend moved in with mother and children in violation of court order and that male friend’s attempts to undermine children’s relationship with their father was sufficient to support changing custody of children from mother to father); (father’s affidavit alleged facts, which if true, would establish emotional endangerment to children.
Marriage of Nelson v. Quade 413 N.W.2d 824 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Nelson v. Quade 413 N.W.2d 824 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Hebeisen v. Hebeisen 401 N.W.2d 420 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Hebeisen v. Hebeisen 401 N.W.2d 420 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Bjerke v. Wilcox 401 N.W.2d 97 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Bjerke v. Wilcox 401 N.W.2d 97 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
We need not address the court’s conclusions concerning an agreement to modify custody or an “integration.” -21 (Minn.Ct.App.1985), held that the “present environment” referred to in section 518.18(d)(iii) “is intended to mean the judicially approved environment.” In Taflin the children lived with their grandparents by private arrangement.
Marriage of Tuthill v. Tuthill 399 N.W.2d 230 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Tuthill v. Tuthill 399 N.W.2d 230 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Wenndt v. Wenndt 398 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Wenndt v. Wenndt 398 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
the father sought custody from an allegedly neglectful mother of his children then living with grandparents.
Sulzbach v. Sulzbach 395 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Sulzbach v. Sulzbach 395 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
*454 (district court’s denial of a motion to forgive child support arrear-ages was affirmed because the father failed to provide sufficient income information and the trial court did “not possess enough documentation to properly determine Petitioner’s income”).
Marriage of Huckbody v. Freeburg 388 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Huckbody v. Freeburg 388 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Lundell v. Lundell 387 N.W.2d 654 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Lundell v. Lundell 387 N.W.2d 654 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Lindberg v. Lindberg 379 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Lindberg v. Lindberg 379 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(applying Dent to enforce support obligation of father who stopped payments after his children began living with their maternal grandparents); (Dent applied to enforce support obligation of obligor parent who assumed the care of his children and then s
S.G.K. v. K.S.K. 374 N.W.2d 525 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Sgk v. Ksk 374 N.W.2d 525 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Sgk v. Ksk 374 N.W.2d 525 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
S.G.K. v. K.S.K. 374 N.W.2d 525 Minn. Ct. App. 1985