Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. Cooper v. French, 460 N.W.2d 2.

1079 citing documents.

Oliver v. State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Transportation 760 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Oliver v. State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Transportation 760 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Fontaine v. Steen 759 N.W.2d 672 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Fontaine v. Steen 759 N.W.2d 672 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Donnelly Bros. Construction Co. v. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Co. 759 N.W.2d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Donnelly Bros. Construction Co. v. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Co. 759 N.W.2d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Wallboard, Inc. v. St. Cloud Mall, LLC 758 N.W.2d 356 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Wallboard, Inc. v. St. Cloud Mall, LLC 758 N.W.2d 356 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Metro Gold, Inc. v. Coin 757 N.W.2d 924 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Metro Gold, Inc. v. Coin 757 N.W.2d 924 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Karnewie-Tuah v. Frazier 757 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Karnewie-Tuah v. Frazier 757 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Thomas B. Olson & Associates, P.A. v. Leffert, Jay & Polglaze, P.A. 756 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Thomas B. Olson & Associates, P.A. v. Leffert, Jay & Polglaze, P.A. 756 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
“On an appeal from summary judgment, we ask two questions: (1) whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and (2) whether the [district court] erred in [its] application of the law.”
Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Northeast Concrete Products, LLC 756 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Northeast Concrete Products, LLC 756 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Prokop v. Independent School Dist. No. 625 754 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Prokop v. Independent School Dist. No. 625 754 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
ANALYSIS I. “On an appeal from summary judgment, we ask two questions: (1) whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and (2) whether the lower courts erred in their application of the law.”
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No. 292 v. City of St. Cloud 750 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No. 292 v. City of St. Cloud 750 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Frieler v. Carlson Marketing Group, Inc. 751 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 2008
Frieler v. Carlson Marketing Group, Inc. 751 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 2008
U.S. Home Corp. v. Zimmerman Stucco & Plaster, Inc. 749 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
U.S. Home Corp. v. Zimmerman Stucco & Plaster, Inc. 749 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Kunza v. St. Mary's Regional Health Center 747 N.W.2d 586 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Petersen 748 N.W.2d 306 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Petersen 748 N.W.2d 306 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Kunza v. St. Mary's Regional Health Center 747 N.W.2d 586 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Northern Realty Ventures, LLC v. Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 748 N.W.2d 296 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Northern Realty Ventures, LLC v. Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 748 N.W.2d 296 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Edina Community Lutheran Church v. State 745 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Edina Community Lutheran Church v. State 745 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Peterka v. Dennis 744 N.W.2d 28 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Peterka v. Dennis 744 N.W.2d 28 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
ANALYSIS “On appeal from summary judgment, we ask two questions: (1) whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and (2) whether the [district] court[ ] erred in [its] application of the law.”
Clark v. Peterson 741 N.W.2d 136 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Clark v. Peterson 741 N.W.2d 136 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Gomez v. David A. Williams Realty & Construction, Inc. 740 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Gomez v. David A. Williams Realty & Construction, Inc. 740 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
ANALYSIS I. Standard of review “On an appeal from summary judgment we ask two questions: (1) whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and (2) whether the [district] court[ ] erred in [its] application of the law.”
Marriage of Thompson v. Thompson 739 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Marriage of Thompson v. Thompson 739 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Paradigm Enterprises, Inc. v. Westfield National Insurance Co. 738 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. A.P.I., Inc. 738 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. A.P.I., Inc. 738 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
On an appeal from summary judgment, this court must decide “(1) whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and (2) whether the [district] court erred in [its] application of the law.”
Paradigm Enterprises, Inc. v. Westfield National Insurance Co. 738 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
ANALYSIS On appeal from summary judgment, we consider two questions: “(1) whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and (2) whether the [district] court[ ] erred in [its] application of the law.”
Carlson v. Allstate Insurance Co. 734 N.W.2d 695 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Carlson v. Allstate Insurance Co. 734 N.W.2d 695 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Risdall v. Brown-Wilbert, Inc. 733 N.W.2d 827 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Risdall v. Brown-Wilbert, Inc. 733 N.W.2d 827 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Carlson v. Sala Architects, Inc. 732 N.W.2d 324 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Johnson v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. 732 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 2007