Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. Cooper v. French, 460 N.W.2d 2.

1079 citing documents.

Johnson v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. 732 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Carlson v. Sala Architects, Inc. 732 N.W.2d 324 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
On an appeal from summary judgment, this court must decide “(1) whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and (2) whether the [district] court erred in [its] application of the law.”
Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of Minnesota 731 N.W.2d 836 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of Minnesota 731 N.W.2d 836 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Wakefield Pork, Inc. v. Ram Mutual Insurance Co. 731 N.W.2d 154 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Wakefield Pork, Inc. v. Ram Mutual Insurance Co. 731 N.W.2d 154 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
ANALYSIS I On appeal from summary judgment, this court “ask[s] two questions: (1) whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and (2) whether the [district] court[] erred in [its] application of the law.”
Osborne v. Twin Town Bowl, Inc. 730 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
GRUNDTNER v. University of Minnesota 730 N.W.2d 323 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Osborne v. Twin Town Bowl, Inc. 730 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
ANALYSIS “On appeal from summary judgment, we ask two questions: (1) whether there are any genuine issues of material fact, and (2) whether the [district] court[ ] erred in [its] application of the law.”
GRUNDTNER v. University of Minnesota 730 N.W.2d 323 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Curiskis v. City of Minneapolis 729 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Curiskis v. City of Minneapolis 729 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
“On an appeal from summary judgment, we ask two questions: (1) whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and (2) whether the [district] court[ ] erred in [its] application of the law.”
Borgersen v. Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. 729 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Borgersen v. Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. 729 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
On appeal from summary judgment, this court “ask[s] two questions: (1) whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and (2) whether the [district] court[ ] erred in [its] application of the law.”
Minnesota Teamsters Public & Law Enforcement Employees Union, Local 320 v. County of St. Louis 726 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Minnesota Teamsters Public & Law Enforcement Employees Union, Local 320 v. County of St. Louis 726 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Allete, Inc. v. GEC Engineering, Inc. 726 N.W.2d 520 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Allete, Inc. v. GEC Engineering, Inc. 726 N.W.2d 520 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
McIntosh County Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP 726 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
McIntosh County Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP 726 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Goeman v. Allstate Insurance Co. 725 N.W.2d 375 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Meads v. Best Oil Co. 725 N.W.2d 538 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Goeman v. Allstate Insurance Co. 725 N.W.2d 375 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Meads v. Best Oil Co. 725 N.W.2d 538 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Rixmann v. City of Prior Lake 723 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Rixmann v. City of Prior Lake 723 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Pahnke v. Anderson Moving and Storage 720 N.W.2d 875 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Pahnke v. Anderson Moving and Storage 720 N.W.2d 875 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Peterson v. Johnson 720 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Peterson v. Johnson 720 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
McClure v. Davis Engineering, L.L.C. 716 N.W.2d 354 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
McClure v. Davis Engineering, L.L.C. 716 N.W.2d 354 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Lake Superior Center Authority v. Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc. 715 N.W.2d 458 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Lake Superior Center Authority v. Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc. 715 N.W.2d 458 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Harrison Ex Rel. Harrison v. Harrison 713 N.W.2d 74 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Anderson v. McOskar Enterprises, Inc. 712 N.W.2d 796 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Rasmussen v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority 712 N.W.2d 802 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Anderson v. McOskar Enterprises, Inc. 712 N.W.2d 796 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Harrison Ex Rel. Harrison v. Harrison 713 N.W.2d 74 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Rasmussen v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority 712 N.W.2d 802 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
BCBSM, Inc. v. Minnesota Comprehensive Health Ass'n 713 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
BCBSM, Inc. v. Minnesota Comprehensive Health Ass'n 713 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re Collier 711 N.W.2d 826 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re Collier 711 N.W.2d 826 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
ANALYSIS “On an appeal from summary judgment, we ask two questions: (1) whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and (2) whether the [district] court[] erred in [its] application of the law.”
Bradley v. First Nat. Bank of Walker, N.A. 711 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Bradley v. First Nat. Bank of Walker, N.A. 711 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Northwestern National Insurance Co. v. Carlson 711 N.W.2d 821 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Northwestern National Insurance Co. v. Carlson 711 N.W.2d 821 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Northfield Care Center, Inc. v. Anderson 707 N.W.2d 731 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Marvin 707 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 2006