Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Welfare of J.S., 470 N.W.2d 697.

29 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A. L. W. and J. P. N., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
rev. denied (Minn. July 24, 1991).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. J. L. and M. D. C., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See, e.g., T.A.A., d at 710; rev. denied (Minn. July 24, 1991).
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. R. A. and J. M. K., … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. July 24, 1991).
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: M. B. B. and K. C. M., … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
d 697, 704 (Minn. App. 1991), review denied (Minn. July 24, 1991).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. P. T. and S. B. I. T., … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. July 24, 1991).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L.T.P. and L.V.J., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L.T.P. and L.V.J., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“The reasonableness of the efforts can be evidenced by the quantity and quality of the assistance provided to the family.” review denied (July 24, 1991).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: P. A. S. and D. J. P., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: P. A. S. and D. J. P., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
9, in its order but must “show consideration for them in its findings.” review denied (Minn. July 24, 1991).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: I. M. A. a/k/a I. N. and A. … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: I. M. A. a/k/a I. N. and A. … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
The district court need not address each factor in its order but must “show consideration for them in its findings.” review denied (Minn. July 24, 1991).
In re the Welfare of J.R.B. 805 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
In re the Welfare of J.R.B. 805 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Chosa, d at 769 (stating, among other things, “that the evidence relating to termination must address conditions that exist at the time of the hearing”); (noting, in affirming termination of parental rights, the grounds for termination must, among other things, exist at the time of trial), review denied (Minn. July 24,1991).
In re P.T. 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re PT 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In re P.T. 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
review denied (Minn. July 24,1991).
In Re PT 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
review denied (Minn. July 24, 1991).
In Re the Welfare of D.L.R.D. 656 N.W.2d 247 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re the Welfare of D.L.R.D. 656 N.W.2d 247 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
review denied (Minn. July 24, 1991); Minn.Stat.
In Re Child of E.V. 634 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re Child of E.V. 634 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
review denied (Minn. July 24, 1991).
In Re the Welfare of P.R.L. 606 N.W.2d 72 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
In Re the Welfare of P.R.L. 606 N.W.2d 72 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
review denied (Minn. July 24, 1991).
In Re Welfare of MH 595 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
In Re Welfare of MH 595 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
(holding petition to terminate parental rights supported where parent failed to cooperate with court-ordered requirements), review denied (Minn. July 24, 1991); (finding some progress insufficient), review denied (Minn. May 22, 19
Weiler v. Lutz 501 N.W.2d 667 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Weiler v. Lutz 501 N.W.2d 667 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
In Re the Welfare of R.T.B. 492 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In Re the Welfare of R.T.B. 492 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Accordingly, in a proceeding to terminate parental rights, the petitioner bears the burden of proving by “clear and convincing evidence that one or more of the statutory termination grounds exists.” quoted in pet.