Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Terpstra, 546 N.W.2d 280.

33 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
1(a) (20 20) (stating that a district court may order a criminal to pay his victim ’s restitution); 282 (Minn. 1996) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See State v. Terpstra , (holding that restitution may be based on the evidence at trial); Duluth Herald & (holding that, when an appellant fails to provide a transcript, review is limited to the question of whether the district court’s conclusions of
In the Matter of the Welfare of: A. I. Q., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Allowing the district court to factually resolve restitution disputes frees the crime victim “from the burden of instituting a civil action based upon the same conduct.”
A17-0853 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
d 280, 283 (Minn. 1996).
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2018
Palubicki, d at 666; State v. Terpstra , d 280, 283 (Minn. 1996)
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A crime victim has the right to receive restitution as part of the disposition of a criminal charge.” (quotation omitted); Minn. Stat. § 611A.04, subd.
A16-0880 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(affirming restitution for full amount of loss through theft by swindle despite jury’s acquittal of defendant on more serious charge); d 899, 900-01 (Minn. App. 1986) (affirming restitution order for stolen items when defendant was convicted of burglary but acqui
Tony Lee Love v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Tony Lee Love v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
1(a) (2014) (stating that a district court may order a criminal to pay his victim’s restitution); (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Ryan Roy Becker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Ryan Roy Becker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(holding that a district court may order a defendant to pay restitution exceeding the monetary parameters of the theft offense of which he was convicted, but only if the higher amount is supported by a preponderance of the evidence)
Michael Anthony Powell v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Michael Anthony Powell v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“A crime victim has the right to receive restitution as part of the disposition of a criminal charge.” (quotation omitted); Minn. Stat. § 611A.04, subd.
State of Minnesota v. Brandon Wayne Riggs 865 N.W.2d 679 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Brandon Wayne Riggs 865 N.W.2d 679 Minn. 2015
State v. Maxwell 802 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Maxwell 802 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Ramsay 789 N.W.2d 513 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Ramsay 789 N.W.2d 513 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Simion 745 N.W.2d 830 Minn. 2008
State v. Simion 745 N.W.2d 830 Minn. 2008
State v. Palubicki 727 N.W.2d 662 Minn. 2007
State v. Palubicki 727 N.W.2d 662 Minn. 2007
See, (“[T]he word ‘restitution’ connotes restoring or compensating the victim for his loss.
State v. Jones 678 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2004
In Re the Welfare of B.R.C. 675 N.W.2d 348 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re the Welfare of B.R.C. 675 N.W.2d 348 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
(holding that court may order restitution for total amount of loss in excess of monetary parameters of offense).
State v. Latimer 604 N.W.2d 103 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Latimer 604 N.W.2d 103 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
A crime victim “has the right to receive restitution as part of the disposition of a criminal charge.” (quoting Minn.Stat.
In Re the Welfare of J.A.D. 603 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
In Re the Welfare of J.A.D. 603 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Colsch 579 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Colsch 579 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
“Restitution is primarily intended to compensate a crime victim for his or her loss by restoring the victim to their original financial condition.” (providing that “restitution statute was primarily intended to compensate victims”).