Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Camp, 590 N.W.2d 115.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-19 (Minn. 1999) (concluding that probable cause existed to arrest for possession of methamphetamine where officers received information from another deputy that appellant may possess methamphetamine, parties acted evasively , appellant’s story did not match the driver’s statement, search revealed object susp
- John Frederick Haugen, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- In the Matter of the Welfare of: N. B. M., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- , A22-0103 Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Our review of a probable-cause determination involves “an inde pendent review of the facts to determine 3 the reasonableness of the police officer’s actions.” (quotation omitted).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Probable cause exists when “the objective facts are such that under the circumstances a person of ordinary care and prudence (would) entertain an honest and strong suspicion that a [specified fact exists].” (quotation omitted).
- State v. Williams 794 N.W.2d 867 Minn. 2011
-
State v. Williams
794 N.W.2d 867
Minn. 2011
119 n. 9 (Minn.1999) (citing State v. Fish, 280 Minn. 163, 169 , ).
- State v. Loving 775 N.W.2d 872 Minn. 2009
- State v. Loving 775 N.W.2d 872 Minn. 2009
- State v. Krenik 774 N.W.2d 178 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
-
State v. Krenik
774 N.W.2d 178
Minn. Ct. App. 2009
(probable cause to arrest exists when person of ordinary care and prudence would entertain honest and strong suspicion that a crime has been committed).
- State v. Prax 686 N.W.2d 45 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- State v. Prax 686 N.W.2d 45 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- State v. Laducer 676 N.W.2d 693 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- State v. Laducer 676 N.W.2d 693 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- State v. Sherbrooke 633 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Sherbrooke 633 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State, Lake Minnetonka Conservation District v. Horner 617 N.W.2d 789 Minn. 2000
-
State, Lake Minnetonka Conservation District v. Horner
617 N.W.2d 789
Minn. 2000
(stating that trial court’s finding of probable cause to arrest not reversible unless clearly erroneous).
- State v. Cook 610 N.W.2d 664 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-
State v. Cook
610 N.W.2d 664
Minn. Ct. App. 2000
119 n. 8 (Minn.1999) (informant’s reliability enhanced by history of providing accurate information); McCloskey, d at 704 (informant’s willingness to meet face-to-face with police adds to credibility).