Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Lohnes, 344 N.W.2d 605.
- State of Minnesota v. Heather Marie Mangen Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
State of Minnesota v. Heather Marie Mangen
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Brigham City v. Stuart, 547 U.S. 398, 403 (2006); Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573, 586 (1980)
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Kentucky v. King, 563 U.S. 452, 459 (2011)
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(concluding that suspect was arrested when pla ced into squad car, le ft there for three to four hours, handcuffed, and accompanied by police in all of his movements).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Lohnes , 6 review denied (Minn. Sept.
- State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Lohnes , State v. Morin , review denied (Minn. Sept.
- State of Minnesota v. Mark Christian Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
State of Minnesota v. Mark Christian Anderson
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“An arrest takes place when officers restrain a suspect’s liberty of movement.”).
- State v. Jackson 742 N.W.2d 163 Minn. 2007
- State v. Shriner 739 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- State v. Shriner 739 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- State v. Morin 736 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- State v. Morin 736 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- State v. Taylor 590 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
- State v. Taylor 590 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
- State v. Fisher 588 N.W.2d 515 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
- State v. Carver 577 N.W.2d 245 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
-
State v. Carver
577 N.W.2d 245
Minn. Ct. App. 1998
“An arrest takes place when officers restrain a suspect’s liberty of movement.”
- State v. Hardy 577 N.W.2d 212 Minn. 1998
- State v. Hardy 577 N.W.2d 212 Minn. 1998
- State v. Carter 569 N.W.2d 169 Minn. 1997
- State v. Carter 569 N.W.2d 169 Minn. 1997
- State v. Paul 548 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1996
-
State v. Paul
548 N.W.2d 260
Minn. 1996
1371, 1382 , 63 L.Ed.2d 639 (1980)
- County of Hennepin v. Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc., Local 19 527 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1995
- County of Hennepin v. Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc., Local 19 527 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1995
- State v. Moorman 505 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1993
- State v. Moorman 505 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1993
- State v. Hummel 483 N.W.2d 68 Minn. 1992
-
State v. Hummel
483 N.W.2d 68
Minn. 1992
It also should be noted that the Dorman list is not exhaustive and exigent circumstances also may justify warrantless arrests in the home that are not planned, but that occur “in the field as part of unfolding developments.” Olson, d at 97 (citing 2 W. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 6.1(f) at 605-08 (2d ed. 1987) ).
- State v. Gray 456 N.W.2d 251 Minn. 1990
- State v. Gray 456 N.W.2d 251 Minn. 1990
- State v. Alayon 454 N.W.2d 629 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- State v. Alayon 454 N.W.2d 629 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- State v. Olson 436 N.W.2d 92 Minn. 1989
- State v. Olson 436 N.W.2d 92 Minn. 1989
- State v. Storvick 428 N.W.2d 55 Minn. 1988
-
State v. Storvick
428 N.W.2d 55
Minn. 1988
1 The leading Minnesota case dealing with “exigent circumstances” justifying a where we made it clear that we will not rigidly follow the Dorman analysis but will flexibly consider all the circumstances, including those mentioned in Dorman and others not men *59 tioned, to determine if “exigent circumstances” existed to justify the warrantless entry.
- State v. Storvick 423 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- State v. Storvick 423 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Elwood v. County of Rice 423 N.W.2d 671 Minn. 1988
- Elwood v. County of Rice 423 N.W.2d 671 Minn. 1988
- State v. Metz 422 N.W.2d 754 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- State v. Metz 422 N.W.2d 754 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- State v. Ailport 413 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
State v. Ailport
413 N.W.2d 140
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Generally, “[a]n arrest takes place when officers restrain a suspect’s liberty of movement.”
- Vivier v. Commissioner of Public Safety 406 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Vivier v. Commissioner of Public Safety
406 N.W.2d 587
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
“An arrest takes place when officers restrain a suspect’s liberty of movement.”
- State v. Nace 404 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1987