Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Jackson, 351 N.W.2d 352.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(holding that police officer was not required to interrupt suspect’s spontaneous and volunteered statements).
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- State of Minnesota v. Terry Lee West Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- State of Minnesota v. Terry Lee West Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- State of Minnesota v. Malcolm Todey Cooper Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. Malcolm Todey Cooper
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“We independently apply the totality-of-the-circumstances test to the facts as found by the [district] court on the issue of the voluntariness of a defendant's statements.”
- State of Minnesota v. Jerome Deshawn Misters Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
State of Minnesota v. Jerome Deshawn Misters
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
appeal after remand review denied (Minn. Aug.
- State of Minnesota v. Kristopher Lee Roybal Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
State of Minnesota v. Kristopher Lee Roybal
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“We independently apply the totality-of-the-circumstances test to the facts as found by the [district] court on the issue of the voluntariness of a defendant’s statements.”
- State v. Munson 594 N.W.2d 128 Minn. 1999
-
State v. Munson
594 N.W.2d 128
Minn. 1999
(applying “the totality of circumstances test to the facts as found by the trial court on the issue of the voluntariness of a defendant’s statements”).
- State v. Tibiatowski 590 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1999
- State v. Tibiatowski 590 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1999
- State v. Hookom 474 N.W.2d 624 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- State v. Hookom 474 N.W.2d 624 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- State v. Ingold 450 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- State v. Ingold 450 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- State v. Johnson 403 N.W.2d 319 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Johnson 403 N.W.2d 319 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Tuomi 396 N.W.2d 847 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
State v. Tuomi
396 N.W.2d 847
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
1682 , 64 L.Ed.2d 297 (1980)
- State v. Seekon 392 N.W.2d 624 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Friend 385 N.W.2d 313 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
State v. Friend
385 N.W.2d 313
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
appeal after remand pet.
- State v. Jackson 370 N.W.2d 72 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Jackson 370 N.W.2d 72 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Anderson 361 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
State v. Anderson
361 N.W.2d 896
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Since this exception applied, the Gartland court stated, “[i]t was appropriate to use the Hernandez method of computing defendant’s criminal history score * * * tf Anderson’s is misplaced because the gravamen there was that defendant was sentenced consecutively under Hernandez , rather than concurrently.