Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Rigwald v. Rigwald, 423 N.W.2d 701.

22 citing documents.

In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In re the Marriage of: Dia Eldin Jubara, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
App. P. 103.03; (noting that temporary relief orders in dissolution cases are not final appealable orders); see also, (“An appeal should be dis missed as moot when a decision on the merits is no longer necessary or an award of effective relief is no
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Charles Jeremy Epperson. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Terrence Reily Peters v. Deanna Lynn Peters Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Terrence Reily Peters v. Deanna Lynn Peters Minn. Ct. App. 2014
P. 52.01 (stating that findings of fact may be made orally and recorded in open court); (applying this aspect of rule 52.01 in a family law appeal).
In Re Daniel for the Establishment of Cartway 644 N.W.2d 495 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re the Financial Responsibility of Foster Care Services Provided to T.W. 627 N.W.2d 102 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re the Financial Responsibility of Foster Care Services Provided to T.W. 627 N.W.2d 102 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
704 n. 5 (Minn.App.1988).
Sharp v. Bilbro 614 N.W.2d 260 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Sharp v. Bilbro 614 N.W.2d 260 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
(referring to "unappealable temporary relief orders”).
Marriage of Korf v. Korf 553 N.W.2d 706 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Marriage of Korf v. Korf 553 N.W.2d 706 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Steeves v. Campbell 508 N.W.2d 817 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Steeves v. Campbell 508 N.W.2d 817 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Swenson v. Swenson 490 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Swenson v. Swenson 490 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
(statute does not authorize court to require abused party to maintain mortgage payments as a condition of granting her exclusive use of homestead).
Baker v. Baker 481 N.W.2d 871 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Baker v. Baker 481 N.W.2d 871 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Child custody decisions, to be premised on the child’s best interests, are to be based on trial court findings “set forth with a high degree of particularity.” Wallin v. Wallin, 290 Minn. 261, 267 , (application of Wallin to certain domestic abuse custody orders).
Andrasko v. Andrasko 443 N.W.2d 228 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Andrasko v. Andrasko 443 N.W.2d 228 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Hennepin County v. Griffin 429 N.W.2d 283 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Hennepin County v. Griffin 429 N.W.2d 283 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
(finding an order of protection under Minn.Stat.