Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Seaway Port Authority of Duluth v. Midland Insurance Co., 430 N.W.2d 242.

30 citing documents.

A20-0560 A20-0562 A20-0565 Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Co. , n.2 (Minn. App. 1988) (stating that while a nonparty insurance company may have been obligated by state law to pay amounts owed to a party, the district court does not have personal jurisdiction over a nonparty insurance company to order such payment by the nonparty).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Charles Jeremy Epperson. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Co. , n.2 (Minn. App. 1988) (stating that while a nonparty insurance company may have been obligated by state law to pay amounts owed to a party, the district court does not have personal jurisdiction over a nonparty insurance company to order such payment by the nonparty).
A17-1314 A17-1315 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Co. , n.2 (Minn. App. 1988) (stating that while a nonparty insurance company may have been obligated by st ate law to pay amounts owed to a party, the district court does not have personal jurisdiction over a n onparty insurance company to order such payment by the nonparty).
K & R Landholdings, LLC, d/b/a High Banks Resort, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Co. , this court stated that section 549.09, “was not intended to disturb existing la w of prejudgment interest, but to provide for prejudgment interest in situations where prejudgment interest was not already allowed by law.” (Mi nn.
Arthur Allen Hogenson v. Michael W. Hogenson 852 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Arthur Allen Hogenson v. Michael W. Hogenson 852 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Co., this court stated that “[t]he prejudgment interest statute [section 549.09] was not intended to disturb the existing law of prejudgment interest, but to provide for prejudgment interest in situations where prejudgment interest was not already allowed by law.” In that case, this court conclu
Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Franck 644 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Franck 644 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Co., (citing 16 George J. Couch et al., Couch on Insurance § 62.48 (2d ed. 1983)).
Trapp v. Hancuh 587 N.W.2d 61 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Trapp v. Hancuh 587 N.W.2d 61 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Co., see Spinett, d at 840 .
O'Shaughnessy v. Smuckler Corp. 543 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
O'Shaughnessy v. Smuckler Corp. 543 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Steele v. Great West Casualty Co. 540 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Steele v. Great West Casualty Co. 540 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co. 515 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co. 515 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Reinsurance Ass'n of Minnesota v. Johannessen 516 N.W.2d 562 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Reinsurance Ass'n of Minnesota v. Johannessen 516 N.W.2d 562 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
(citing Lill, d at 637 ).
National Family Insurance v. Bunton 509 N.W.2d 565 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
National Family Insurance v. Bunton 509 N.W.2d 565 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Independent School District No. 697 v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 495 N.W.2d 863 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Independent School District No. 697 v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 495 N.W.2d 863 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Co., we do not read Briggs to announce an absolute rule of uninsurability for intentional acts when the policy provides coverage.
Bob Useldinger & Sons, Inc. v. Hangsleben 483 N.W.2d 495 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Bob Useldinger & Sons, Inc. v. Hangsleben 483 N.W.2d 495 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Co., see, e.g., Farmers Home Mut.
Sage Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America 480 N.W.2d 695 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Sage Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America 480 N.W.2d 695 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
American Hoist & Derrick Co. v. Employers' of Wausau 454 N.W.2d 462 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
American Hoist & Derrick Co. v. Employers' of Wausau 454 N.W.2d 462 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
(SPAD) (citing 16 G. Couch, R. Anderson and M. Rhodes, Couch on Insurance 2d, § 62.48 (1983)).
Gaughan v. Gaughan 450 N.W.2d 338 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Gaughan v. Gaughan 450 N.W.2d 338 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
1(b)(6) “applies only to costs and attorney fees added to a judgment by a court.” (emphasis in original).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by