Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Welfare of M.D.O., 462 N.W.2d 370.

313 citing documents.

In Re the Child of Simon 662 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re the Children of Vasquez 658 N.W.2d 249 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re the Children of Vasquez 658 N.W.2d 249 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In re P.T. 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re PT 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In re P.T. 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
“Parental rights are terminated only for grave and weighty reasons.” (citation omitted).
In Re PT 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re the Welfare of D.L.R.D. 656 N.W.2d 247 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re the Welfare of D.L.R.D. 656 N.W.2d 247 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re the Welfare of J.R. 655 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2003
In Re the Welfare of J.R. 655 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2003
7 (2000); and it is the guardian ad litem who speaks for the child, Minn.fit,at.
In Re Child of E.V. 634 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re Child of E.V. 634 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Termination “Parental rights are terminated only for grave and weighty reasons.” (citation omitted).
In Re the Welfare of P.R.L. 622 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 2001
In Re the Welfare of P.R.L. 622 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 2001
In *543 addition, the court of appeals noted that the district court order did not address the requirement that the petitioning party prove that a consistent pattern of specific conduct or specific conditions detrimental to the child existed at the time of the hearing and apparently would continue for a prolonged, indefinite period, as required by
Kissoondath v. United States Fire Insurance Co. 620 N.W.2d 909 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Kissoondath v. United States Fire Insurance Co. 620 N.W.2d 909 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(quoting Arizona v. California, 460 U.S. 605, 618 , 103 S.Ct.
In Re the Welfare of P.R.L. 606 N.W.2d 72 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
In Re the Welfare of P.R.L. 606 N.W.2d 72 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
St. Louis County v. S.D.S. 610 N.W.2d 644 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
St. Louis County v. S.D.S. 610 N.W.2d 644 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
K.M., d at 785 (-75 (Minn.1990)).
In Re Welfare of MH 595 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
In Re Welfare of MH 595 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
In Re the Welfare of A.V. 593 N.W.2d 720 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
In Re the Welfare of A.V. 593 N.W.2d 720 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Marriage of Holmberg v. Holmberg 578 N.W.2d 817 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Marriage of Holmberg v. Holmberg 578 N.W.2d 817 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
(law of the case applies to issues “decided in earlier stages of the same case”); (res judica-ta requires prior ruling on merits of an issue).
In Re the Welfare of D.J.N. 568 N.W.2d 170 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
In Re the Welfare of D.J.N. 568 N.W.2d 170 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Matter of Welfare of DDG 558 N.W.2d 481 Minn. 1997
Matter of Welfare of DDG 558 N.W.2d 481 Minn. 1997
Matter of Welfare of AY-J. 558 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Matter of Welfare of AY-J. 558 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
-75 (Minn.1990) (appellate court deferred to trial court’s assessment of witnesses in evaluating what is in best interests of child during a termination proceeding).
In Re the Welfare of D.D.G. 553 N.W.2d 86 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Welfare of D.D.G. 553 N.W.2d 86 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Welfare of D.T.J. 554 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Welfare of D.T.J. 554 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Welfare of L.A.F. 554 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1996
In Re the Welfare of L.A.F. 554 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1996
In Re the Welfare of A.R.G.-B. 551 N.W.2d 256 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Welfare of A.R.G.-B. 551 N.W.2d 256 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Welfare of L.A.F. 546 N.W.2d 55 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Welfare of L.A.F. 546 N.W.2d 55 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Despite this presumption, “the best inter-esas] of the child standard [is a] paramount consideration in termination of parental rights proceedings.” In re Welfare of J.J.B., N.W.2d 274, 279 (Minn.1986)
In Re the Welfare of S.Z. 547 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1996
In Re the Welfare of S.Z. 547 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1996
The appellate court must determine whether the district court’s “findings address the statutory criteria, whether those findings are supported by substantial evidence, and whether those findings are clearly erroneous.”
Matter of Km 544 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In re the Welfare of K.M. 544 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Matter of Km 544 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In re the Welfare of K.M. 544 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Welfare of M.P. 542 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1996