Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Welfare of M.D.O., 462 N.W.2d 370.
-
County of Hennepin v. Jill Kline Rochford, Ross Edgar Trooien
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Moreover, “[a] party’s failure to brief and argue an issue on appeal results in forfeiture of that issue.” d 201, 204 (Minn. App. 2024) () (other citation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child(ren) of: K. L. S. and C. C. S., Parents
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
DECISION Parental rights may be terminated only for “grave and weighty reasons.”
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child(ren) of: K. L. O. and M. L. G., Parents
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“Parental rights are terminated only for grave and weighty reasons.”
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child(ren) of: T. L. J., Parent
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“Parental rights [may be] terminated only for grave and weighty reasons.”
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child(ren) of: D. K. W. and J. L. C., Parents
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
DECISION Parental rights may be terminated only for “grave and weighty reasons.”
- In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: T. S. N., Parent Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child(ren) of: T. L. S., Parent Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child(ren) of: N. J. M. and W. A. W., Parents
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
DECISION A district court may terminate parental rights only for “grave and weighty reasons.”
- In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. M. D., B. J. J., R. H., … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-
Scott Solon Schaefer-Bonovsky v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(“Neither issue preclusion nor ‘law of the case’ applies [if] the issue has not yet been litigated or decided at trial or on appeal.”).
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child(ren) of: C. B. B. and M. C. P., Parents
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
DECISION Parental rights may only be terminated for “grave and weighty reasons.”
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. P., Parent
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
ANALYSIS “Parental rights are terminated only for grave and weighty reasons.”
-
Richard G. Perry, et al v. State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources, et al., Bruce Allen Junker
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
We grant great deference to the district court’s credibility determinations, see, and will not set aside its factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous
- In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child(ren) of: B. L. C. and R. A. T., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L.K., Parent Minn. 2026
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L.K., Parent
Minn. 2026
(providing that under the law-of- the-case doctrine, “when a court decides upon a rule of law, that decision should continue to govern the same issues in subsequent stages in the same case” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)).
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: D. N. C., A. L., and S. A. …
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“Parental rights are terminated only for grave and weighty reasons.”
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child(ren) of: M. P. and A. P., Parents
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
DECISION A district court may terminate parental rights only for “grave and weighty reasons.”
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. H. G. and R. R. G., Parents
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Parental rights are terminated only for grave and weighty reasons.”
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: K. M. S. and J. J. S., Parents
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
DECISION Parental rights may only be terminated for “grave and weighty reasons.”
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child(ren) of: A. R.-P. and J. O., Parents
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
DECISION “Parental rights are terminated only for grave and weighty reasons.”
- In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: M.C., Parent Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: M.C., Parent
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
DECISION Parental rights may only be terminated “for grave and weighty reasons.”
- State of Minnesota v. Christopher Lawrence Hunt Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Lawrence Hunt
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(holding that the role of the court of appeals is to correct errors, not to find facts).
- In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: B.D.D. and D.A.A., Parents Minn. 2025
- In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: B.D.D. and D.A.A., Parents Minn. 2025
- Minn. 2025
- In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. J. S. I., Parent Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. J. S. I., Parent
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
This is because they “stand in a superior position to appellate courts in assessing the credibility of witnesses.” -75 (Minn. 1990).
- In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A. N. C. and P. D. C., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: S.B.S. and R.E.L., Parents
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Parental rights may be “terminated only for grave and weighty reasons.”
-
State of Minnesota v. Benjamin Michael Brant
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
at 606; - 75 (Minn. 1990) (noting that role of the court of appeals is to correct errors, not find facts).
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: L. H., Parent
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Parental rights may be “terminated only for grave and weighty reasons.”
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: H.S., Parent
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
8 DECISION “Parental rights are terminated only for grave and weighty reasons.”
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. R. E. and H. R. E., Parents
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
An individual’s parental rights may be terminated “only for grave and weighty reasons.”
- In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: S. M. H. and D. J. B., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: R. A. H. and J. P. C., Parents
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
primary factors: [1] the child’s interest in maintaining the parent-child relationship, [2] the parents’ interest in maintaining the parent- child relationship, and [3] any competing interest of the child.” (numerals added); - 79 (Minn. 1990); rev. denied (Minn. Jan.
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A. L. W. and J. P. N., Parents
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
DECISION “Parental rights are terminated only for grave and weighty reasons.”
- In Re the Marriage of: Tricia Margit Wilson v. Justin Arthur Wilson Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. J. W. and L. S. G., Parents
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
DECISION “Parental rights are terminated only for grave and weighty reasons.”
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: B. A. K., F/K/A B. A. K. and …
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
DECISION Parental rights may be terminated only for “grave and weighty reasons.”
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: R. S. O., Parent
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Of relevance to this appeal, the district court declined to 8 convert this case to a CHIPS matter, determining that, due to the “need [to give] children permanency in a timely manner,” mother should not have “more time to make progress.” Mother appeals.3 DECISION “Parental rights are terminated only for grave and weighty reasons.”
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. L. F. and D. W., Parents
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Parental rights are terminated only for grave and weighty reasons.”
- Brooke Lea Simpson and OBO Minor Child v. Joceleyne Maldanado Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: F. K. O., M. L. O., J. R. …
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(concluding that the county’s expectations seemed “especially daunting considering the county’s admitted failure to provide services, counseling or assistance to aid [appellant] in coming to grips with her conduct”).
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: M. R. M. and K. L. E., Parents
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
DECISION “Parental rights are terminated only for grave and weighty reasons.”
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. S., Parent
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
A child’s best interests is “the paramount consideration in every termination [of parental rights] case.” see also Minn. Stat. § 260C.301, subd.
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A. N. W. and Z. C. W., Parents
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Mother argues that, under the district court’s conclusions are insufficient to support termination of her parental rights for palpable unfitness.
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: T. L. H. and C. C., Parents
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
DECISION “Parental rights are terminated only for grave and weighty reasons.”