Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Welfare of M.D.O., 462 N.W.2d 370.

322 citing documents.

In Re the Welfare of L.A.F. 546 N.W.2d 55 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Welfare of L.A.F. 546 N.W.2d 55 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Despite this presumption, “the best inter-esas] of the child standard [is a] paramount consideration in termination of parental rights proceedings.” In re Welfare of J.J.B., N.W.2d 274, 279 (Minn.1986)
In Re the Welfare of S.Z. 547 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1996
In Re the Welfare of S.Z. 547 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1996
The appellate court must determine whether the district court’s “findings address the statutory criteria, whether those findings are supported by substantial evidence, and whether those findings are clearly erroneous.”
Matter of Km 544 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In re the Welfare of K.M. 544 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Matter of Km 544 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In re the Welfare of K.M. 544 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Welfare of M.P. 542 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Welfare of M.P. 542 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
(in addressing child’s best interests, trial court considered, among other things, “the likelihood of adoption”).
Matter of Welfare of Sz 536 N.W.2d 37 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Matter of Welfare of Sz 536 N.W.2d 37 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Despite this presumption, “the best interest[s] of the child standard [is a] paramount consideration in termination of parental rights proceedings.”
In Re the Welfare of A.D. 535 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 1995
In Re the Welfare of A.D. 535 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 1995
Trial courts “stand in a superior position to appellate courts in assessing the credibility of witnesses * * -75 (Minn.1990).
Marriage of Kornberg v. Kornberg 525 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Marriage of Kornberg v. Kornberg 525 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
“The ‘law of the case’ doctrine commonly applies to issues decided in earlier stages of the same case.”
In Re the Welfare of S.R.A. 527 N.W.2d 835 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
In Re the Welfare of S.R.A. 527 N.W.2d 835 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
This court’s sole function on review of a termination case is to “determine whether the trial court’s findings address the statutory criteria, whether those findings are supported by substantial evidence, and whether those findings are clearly erroneous.”
In Re the Welfare of J.D.L. 522 N.W.2d 364 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
In Re the Welfare of J.D.L. 522 N.W.2d 364 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
In *367 re Welfare of M.D.O.
Matter of Trust Created by Hill 499 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Matter of Trust Created by Hill 499 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 1993