Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Agriculture, 528 N.W.2d 903.

57 citing documents.

In re Defense and Indemnification of Matthew Severance - Awaijane v. Bittell, In re Defense and ... Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re Defense and Indemnification of Matthew Severance - Awaijane v. Bittell, In re Defense and ... Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. Minn. Dep’t of Agric., rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
In re City of St. Paul’s Decision on the Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Mitigation includes avoiding or limiting the size of a project, repairing or restoring the environment, working to preserve or maintain the environment during the life of the project, or replacing or substituting resources.” Trout Unlimited v. Minn. Dep’t of Agric., (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
Complaint Decision File 24-170C on behalf of L.L.B. from Delano 0879-01. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. Comm’r of Minn. Dep’t of Educ., (quoting Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. Minn. Dep’t of Agric., rev. denied (Minn. May 28, 2014)).
Complaint Decision File 23-010C on behalf of D.V.G. from South Washington County Schools 0833-01. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
16 Comm’r of the Minn. Dep’t of Educ., (quoting Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. Minn. Dep’t of Agric., ).
East Phillips Neighborhood Institute, Inc., et al., Relators, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See, e.g., Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. Minn. Dep’t of Agric., -09 (Minn. App. 1995) (holding an EAW was arbitrary and capricious when the commissioner did not consider environmental effects likely to result from the project or how any effects could be mitigated in determining the need for an EIS and instead entirely deferred those considerations until construction of the
Jacob Robuck, et al., Relators, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(quoting Trout Unltd., Inc. v. Minn. Dep’t of Agric., ), rev. denied (Minn. May 28, 2014).6 Robuck first argues DPS’s decision that he did not conduct the MNDRIVE searches for a “lawful business purpose” is arbitrary and unsupported by substantial evidence.
In the Matter of the Determination of Need for an Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the Border to Border … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
- 08 (Minn. App. 1995) (holding that an agency acted arbitrarily when it ignored the concerns from sister agencies about the cumulative effects of a proposed project), rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
In the Matter of the Reestablishment of Big Stone County Ditch 21 Drainage System Records. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
d 903, 907 -08 (Minn. App. 1995) (stating that disputed documents available and in possession of agency are part of record and sh ould have been considered by agency) , review denied (Minn. Apr.
In the Matter of the Determination of the Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Nolte Family … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
07 (Minn. App. 1995) (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Apr.
In the Matter of the Determination of the Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Mankato Motorsports … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
entirely fails to address an important aspect of the problem ”; “offers an explanation that is counter to the evidence” ; or is “so implausible that it could not be explained as a difference in view or the result of the RGU’s decision -making expertise.” d 378, 381 (Minn. App. 2009); see also Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. Minn. Dep’t of Agric., (Minn. App. 4 CAMP includes relators Michael Guentzel and Erin Guentzel.
In the Matter of Alan Joshua Woggon, D.C. License No. 6076. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
No. 834, (stating that school board decision is “entitled to judicial deference” and appellate court “will not substitute our own judgment for that of a board” ); Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. Minn. Dep’t of Agric ., (sta ting that an agency decision is arbitrary and capricious if it represents the agency’s will rather than its judgment), review denied (Minn. Apr.
In the Matter of the Application of Minnesota Power for Authority to Increase Rates for Electric Service in … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. Minn. Dep’t of Agric., review denied (Minn. Apr.
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
When considering whether to require an EIS, the MPCA “must consider the type, extent, and reversibility of environmental effects, and the extent to which the environmental effects are subject to mitigation by ongoing public regulatory authority.” Trout Unlimited v. Minn. Dep’t of Agric., (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Apr.
In re Applications of Enbridge Energy, Ltd. 930 N.W.2d 12 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re Applications of Enbridge Energy, Ltd. 930 N.W.2d 12 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
908 (Minn. App. 1995) (holding that commissioner of agriculture acted arbitrarily by determining that water-appropriate permit would not have cumulative potential effects in light of letters from the MPCA, DNR and Minnesota Department of Health indicating to the contrary), review denied (Minn. Apr.
A18-1291 A18-1292 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Dep’t of Agric., (holding that commissioner of agriculture acted 34 arbitrarily by determining that water -appropriate permit would not have cumulative potential effects in light of letters from the MPCA, DNR and M innesota Department of Health indicating to the contrary), review denied (Minn. Apr.
West McDonald Lake Ass'n v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 899 N.W.2d 832 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
West McDonald Lake Ass'n v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 899 N.W.2d 832 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
1995), review denied (Minn. July 29, 1995); Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. Minn. Dep’t of Agric., -07 (Minn.App.
Re: Declaring a Negative Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Living Word Bible Camp Project. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Re: Declaring a Negative Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Living Word Bible Camp Project. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. Minn. Dep’t of Agric., -08 (Minn. App. 1995), review denied (Minn. Apr.
Minnesota Transitions Charter School v. Commissioner of Minnesota Department of Education 844 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Constans v. Commissioner of Public Safety 835 N.W.2d 518 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Constans v. Commissioner of Public Safety 835 N.W.2d 518 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Cf. Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. Minn. Dep’t of Agric., -08 (Minn.App.1995) (providing that an administrative action is arbitrary or capricious if the agency relied on factors that the legislature did not intend it to consider), review denied (Minn. Apr.
Pallas v. Commissioner of Public Safety 781 N.W.2d 163 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Pallas v. Commissioner of Public Safety 781 N.W.2d 163 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. Minn. Dep’t of Agric., review denied 1 (Minn. Apr.
Friends of Twin Lakes v. City of Roseville 764 N.W.2d 378 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Friends of Twin Lakes v. City of Roseville 764 N.W.2d 378 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re Appeal of Staley 730 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re Appeal of Staley 730 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. Minn. Dep’t of Agric., review denied (Minn. Apr.
Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. City of St. Paul Park 711 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. City of St. Paul Park 711 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
It cites Trout Unlimited, Inc., v. Minn. Dep’t of Agric., review denied (Minn. Apr.
In Re Detailing Criteria & Standards for Measuring an Electric Utility's Good Faith Efforts in Meeting the Renewable … 700 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re Detailing Criteria & Standards for Measuring an Electric Utility's Good Faith Efforts in Meeting the Renewable … 700 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Blue Shield of Minn., -83 (Minn.2001), or if the agency relies on factors that the legislature did not intend the agency to consider, fails to consider an important aspect of the issue, provides an explanation that is contrary to the record, or renders a decision so implausible that it could not be ascribed to agency expertise, Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. Minn., Dep’t of Agric., (citing Motor Vehicle Mfrs.
In Re the City of Owatonna's NPDES/SDS Proposed Permit Reissuance 672 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re the City of Owatonna's NPDES/SDS Proposed Permit Reissuance 672 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. Minnesota Dep’t of Agric., (quotation and citation omitted), review denied (Minn. Apr.
Max Schwartzman & Sons v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 670 N.W.2d 746 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Max Schwartzman & Sons v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 670 N.W.2d 746 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. Minn. Dep’t of Agric., review denied (Minn. Apr.
McEa v. Mpca 632 N.W.2d 230 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
McEa v. Mpca 632 N.W.2d 230 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Trout Unlimited, (citations omitted), review denied (Minn. April 27, 1995).
Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 632 N.W.2d 230 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 632 N.W.2d 230 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
An agency’s decision is also considered arbitrary or capricious if “it represents the agency’s will, rather than its judgment.” Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. Minnesota Dep’t of Agric., (citations omitted), review denied (Minn. April 27, 1995).
In Re American Iron and Supply Co. 604 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
City of Minneapolis v. State 604 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
City of Minneapolis v. State 604 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
See Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. Minnesota Dep’t of Agric., review denied (Minn. Apr.
In Re American Iron and Supply Co. 604 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
See Trout Unlimited, review denied (Minn. Apr.
Pope County Mothers v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 594 N.W.2d 233 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Pope County Mothers v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 594 N.W.2d 233 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. Minnesota Dep’t of Agric., review denied (Minn. Apr.
Madison v. Commissioner of Public Safety 585 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
National Audubon Society v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 569 N.W.2d 211 Minn. Ct. App. 1997