Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite In re the Welfare of S.J.J., 528 N.W.2d 869.
-
Timothy Soboleski, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Frank Soboleski, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
v. T.F., n.3 (Minn. 1995).
- Renee Dianne Florek, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
v. T.F., (quotation omitted).
-
Breaker v. Bemidji State University
899 N.W.2d 515
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
v. T.F., , 872 n.3 (Minn. 1995).
- Estate of Gladys I. Norby v. Waseca Mutual Insurance Company n/k/a Austin Mutual Insurance Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Ram Mutual Insurance Co. v. Meyer
768 N.W.2d 399
Minn. Ct. App. 2009
v. T.F., (“The law in Minnesota is well-settled that an intentional act exclusion applies only where the insured acts with a specific intent to'cause bodily harm.
-
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Schwich
749 N.W.2d 108
Minn. Ct. App. 2008
v. T.F., (refusing, on public policy grounds, to “promote the abdication of personal responsibility by providing insurance coverage” for knowing transmission of sexually transmitted disease); Peterson, d at 422 (stating that purpose of intentional act exclusion is “to deny insured license to commit wa
- B.M.B. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 664 N.W.2d 817 Minn. 2003
- Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. Ehmke 664 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- American Family Insurance Co. v. Walser 628 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 2001
-
Improvement of County Ditch No. 86, Branch 1, County of Blue Earth v. Phillips
614 N.W.2d 756
Minn. Ct. App. 2000
v. T.F., , 872 n. 3 (Minn.1995).
-
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Neises
598 N.W.2d 709
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
v. T.F., (intent inferred from insured’s knowing failure to disclose that he had genital herpes); Fireman’s Fund Ins.
-
Gaw v. Dmw
596 N.W.2d 284
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
v. T.F., , 872 n.3 (Minn.1995).
-
G.A.W. v. D.M.W.
596 N.W.2d 284
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
v. T.F., , 872 n. 3 (Minn.1995).
-
Amos Ex Rel. Amos v. Campbell
593 N.W.2d 263
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
v. T.F., -73 (Minn.1995) (inference that sexual assault is an intentional act, “ ‘because one cannot negligently assault another’” (citation omitted)).
-
German Mutual Insuurance Co. v. Yeager
554 N.W.2d 116
Minn. Ct. App. 1996
v. T.F., (inferring as matter of law intention to transmit disease due to insured’s knowing failure to disclose he had genital herpes); Allstate *118 Ins.
-
Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Todd
547 N.W.2d 696
Minn. 1996
v. T.F., -73 (Minn.1995); see also Horace Mann Ins.
-
Meadowbrook, Inc. v. Tower Insurance Co.
543 N.W.2d 418
Minn. Ct. App. 1996
v. T.F., (intent to injure inferred where insured, knowing he had herpes, transmitted the disease by consensual sexual contact); State Farm Fire & (intent to injure inferred where authority figure sexually assaulted man with cerebral palsy); Woida v. North St