Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Rodne v. Commissioner of Human Services, 547 N.W.2d 440.

28 citing documents.

Susan P. Robinson, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
John Kamande, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
S. K., Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Rodne v. Comm’r of H uman Servs.
L. M. P., Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A. L. G., Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
3, 606.06 (2018); see Rodne v. Comm’r of Human Servs.
Shonwta Demar Jackson, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
d 440, 444-45 (Minn. App. 1996).
Cosmos E. Eneh, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Rodne v. Comm’r of Human Servs., (indicating that MAPA did not apply to a request f or reconsideration of a decision by DHS because a contested -case proceeding was not required by statute).
Fatoumata Kaba, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
4–45 (Minn. App. 1996) (alteration omitted) (quotation omitted) .
Douglas Place Treatment Center, LLC, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
” Anderson v. Comm’r of Health, (quoting Rodne v. Comm’r of Human Servs., –45 (Minn. App. 1996)), review denied (Minn. Apr.
Audrey Melody Ashford, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Rodne v. Comm’r of Human Servs., –45 (Minn. App. 1996).
In the Matter of the Medical License of S. Fred Everett, M.D., Year of Birth: 1935, License Number: … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Medical License of S. Fred Everett, M.D., Year of Birth: 1935, License Number: … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
v. Nor-West Cable Commc’ns P’ship, see also Rodne v. Comm’r of Human Servs., –45 (Minn. App. 1996) (“On certiorari appeal from a quasi-judicial agency decision that is not subject to the administrative procedure act, we inspect the record to review ‘.
In re Application of EOF Investments, LLC. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re Application of EOF Investments, LLC. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Rodne v. Comm’r of Human Servs., -45 (Minn. App. 1996) (stating that the determinations of quasi-judicial bodies are reviewed for arbitrary action).
George Marita Obara, Relator v. Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2015
George Marita Obara, Relator v. Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Rodne v. Comm’r of Human Servs.
Angie Rachel Ford, Relator v. Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Angie Rachel Ford, Relator v. Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Rodne v. Comm’r of Human Servs.
Anderson v. Commissioner of Health 811 N.W.2d 162 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Anderson v. Commissioner of Health 811 N.W.2d 162 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
See Rodne v. Comm’r of Human Servs.
Smith v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 764 N.W.2d 388 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Smith v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 764 N.W.2d 388 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
agency’s quasi-judicial action, we review the record to determine whether (1) the agency had jurisdiction over the matter; (2) the agency followed the correct procedure; and (3) the agency’s determination of the merits of the controversy was “arbitrary, oppressive, unreasonable, fraudulent, under an erroneous theory of law, or without any evidence to support it.” Rodne v. Comm’r of Human Servs.
Hickman v. Commissioner of Human Services 682 N.W.2d 697 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Hickman v. Commissioner of Human Services 682 N.W.2d 697 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Rodne v. Comm’r of Human Servs.
Fosselman v. Commissioner of Human Services 612 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Fosselman v. Commissioner of Human Services 612 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
ANALYSIS A quasi-judicial agency decision not subject to the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) is reviewed on writ of certiorari by inspecting the record to determine whether the decision was “ ‘arbitrary, oppressive, unreasonable, fraudulent, under an erroneous theory of law, or without any evidence to support it.’ ” -45 (Minn.App.1996) ( (other quotations omitted)).
Stang v. Minnesota Teachers Retirement Ass'n Board of Trustees 566 N.W.2d 345 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Stang v. Minnesota Teachers Retirement Ass'n Board of Trustees 566 N.W.2d 345 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
-45 (Minn.App.1996); see also Axelson v. Minneapolis Teachers’ Retirement Fund Ass’n.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by