Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Rhodes, 627 N.W.2d 74.

66 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Attorney-client privilege 10 does not attach to “confidences given in the presence of third parties.” State v. Rhodes , ; see also Schwartz v. Wenger , (holding that discussion of privileged information in a public place waives the privilege insofar as the testimony of the obvious third -party is concerned).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Reinbold’s invocation of other authority, does not persuade us to a different conclusion.
Berry Alexander Davis, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent Minn. 2025
Berry Alexander Davis, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent Minn. 2025
Davis speculates this unknown woman “could have been running for [her] life because she witnessed the shooting of [] Baugh, thus, knowing what the shooter looked like[, or she] could have been the shooter.” “[N]ot every ineffective assistance of counsel claim will require an evidentiary hearing.”
State of Minnesota v. Jamal L. Smith 9 N.W.3d 543 Minn. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Jamal L. Smith 9 N.W.3d 543 Minn. 2024
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“There is a strong presumption that counsel’s performance was reasonable.”
Minn. 2022
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Deontray Vershon Tate, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
But doubts as to the necessity of an evidentiary hearing “should be resolved in favor of the party requesting the hearing.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A defendant claiming the district court erred in adm itting evidence bears th e burden of provin g the admission was erroneous and prejudicial.” State v. Rhodes
State of Minnesota v. Earl Lionell Ward Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Distinguished State of Minnesota v. Earl Lionell Ward Minn. Ct. App. 2016
7 see also, (declining to address appellant’s insufficiency-of-the-evidence claim due to the incomplete record).
Thomas Daniel Rhodes v. State of Minnesota, A13-560 875 N.W.2d 779 Minn. 2016
Thomas Daniel Rhodes v. State of Minnesota, A13-560 875 N.W.2d 779 Minn. 2016
See Rhodes v. State (Rhodes III), State v. Rhodes (Rhodes II), State v. Rhodes (Rhodes I)
State of Minnesota v. Cindarion De'Angelo Butler Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Cindarion De'Angelo Butler Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Amir Abd El Malak Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Amir Abd El Malak Minn. Ct. App. 2015
d 74, 88 (Minn. 2001) (concluding that an “evidentiary hearing [was] necessary to determine whether the level of trial counsel’s advocacy was unreasonable” based in part 2 At oral argument to this court, appellant’s counsel acknowledged that appellant’s alleged penetration of S.K.
State v. Wenthe 839 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 2013
State v. Wenthe 839 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 2013
See, -86 (Minn.2001); , 909 n. 4 (Minn.1996); see also Ideal Life Church of Lake Elmo, d at 315 (approving the use of a multifaceted test to determine whether an institution is a “church” for tax purpos
Andersen v. State 830 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2013
Francis v. State 781 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 2010
Francis v. State 781 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 2010
“Any doubts as to whether to conduct an evidentiary hearing should be resolved in favor of the party requesting the hearing.” (citing State ex rel.
Vickla v. State 778 N.W.2d 354 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Vickla v. State 778 N.W.2d 354 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
“A postconviction court properly dismisses a petition for postconviction relief without conducting an evidentiary hearing when the petition and record ‘conclusively show that the petitioner is entitled to no relief.’ ” (quoting Minn. Stat. § 590.04 , subd.
State v. Loving 775 N.W.2d 872 Minn. 2009
State v. Loving 775 N.W.2d 872 Minn. 2009
State v. Yang 774 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 2009
State v. Yang 774 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 2009
“Any doubts as to whether to conduct an evidentiary hearing should be resolved in favor of the party requesting the hearing.”
Chambers v. State 769 N.W.2d 762 Minn. 2009
Chambers v. State 769 N.W.2d 762 Minn. 2009
“A postconviction court must evaluate whether, in light of the significance of the claimed error and the evidence presented at trial, a petitioner has raised and factually supported material matters that must be resolved in order to decide the postconviction issues on their merits.”
Sanchez-Diaz v. State 758 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 2008
Sanchez-Diaz v. State 758 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 2008
“Any doubts as to whether to conduct an evidentiary hearing should be resolved in favor of the party requesting the hearing.” (citing State ex rel.
Jama v. State 756 N.W.2d 107 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Jama v. State 756 N.W.2d 107 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
"A postconviction court must evaluate whether, in light of the significance of the claimed error and the evidence presented at trial, a petitioner has raised and factually supported material matters that must be resolved in order to decide the postconviction issues on their merits.”
State v. Bussmann 741 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 2007
State v. Bussmann 741 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 2007
Rhodes v. State 735 N.W.2d 315 Minn. 2007
Rhodes v. State 735 N.W.2d 315 Minn. 2007
(Rhodes I), (Rhodes II).
Schneider v. State 725 N.W.2d 516 Minn. 2007
Schneider v. State 725 N.W.2d 516 Minn. 2007
(concluding that the affidavits of two expert defense lawyers raised “material questions” and an evidentiary hearing was necessary to determine whether trial counsel’s advocacy was unreasonable).
Powers v. State 688 N.W.2d 559 Minn. 2004
Powers v. State 688 N.W.2d 559 Minn. 2004
Hooper v. State 680 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 2004
Hooper v. State 680 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 2004
Opsahl v. State 677 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 2004
Opsahl v. State 677 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 2004
“We review a postconviction proceeding to determine if there is sufficient evidence to sustain the postconviction court’s findings, and we will not disturb the court’s decision absent an abuse of discretion.”
McKenzie v. State 670 N.W.2d 582 Minn. 2003
McKenzie v. State 670 N.W.2d 582 Minn. 2003
An “appellant must allege facts that would, if proven by a fair preponderance of the evidence, entitle him to relief.”