Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Trusteeship of the Trust of Williams, 631 N.W.2d 398.

28 citing documents.

In RE: The Matter of the Irrevocable Trust of Myron E. Childs, dated November 2, 2000 Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In RE: The Matter of the Irrevocable Trust of Myron E. Childs, dated November 2, 2000 Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Lana Waldron, as successor Trustee of the Pick Family Trust dated December 11, 2013 v. Marilyn A Stenzel, … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Lana Waldron, as successor Trustee of the Pick Family Trust dated December 11, 2013 v. Marilyn A Stenzel, … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Williams, -10 (Minn. App. 2001) (“[I]t is a fundamental principle of law deeply ingrained in our common law jurisprudence that each party bears his own attorney fees in the absence of a statutory or contractual exception” and “there is no Minnesota case requiring a trustee whose management of a trust has been challenged to
In the Matter of the Leonard E. Erlandson and Marion L. Erlandson Irrevocable Trust Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Leonard E. Erlandson and Marion L. Erlandson Irrevocable Trust Minn. Ct. App. 2024
of Williams, (“Damage awards are reviewed under an abuse-of-discretion standard.”), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Joan C. Ranallo Trust. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
of Williams, rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
A minor child by his mother and natural guardian, Chelsea Rose, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
of Williams, rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
of Williams, (“Only when there are no statutory or judicial precedents to follow will the Court of Appeals make new law.”), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Followed A20-0508 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
of Williams , (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Kevin Chouanard, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
of Williams, review denied (Minn. Sept.
Finn v. Alliance Bank 838 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Finn v. Alliance Bank 838 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
This court is an intermediate appellate court, and its role is “primarily decisional and error correcting.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State v. McCormick 835 N.W.2d 498 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. McCormick 835 N.W.2d 498 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Our role is “to find the law, to state it and to apply it to the facts.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T. 814 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
In re the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T. 814 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Accord Bevel, 717 S.E.2d at 794-95 (recognizing that legislature is best forum for advancing abatement doctrine); (MinmApp.
Derosier v. Utility Systems of America, Inc. 780 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Derosier v. Utility Systems of America, Inc. 780 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
In Re Margolis Revocable Trust 765 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Lorberbaum v. Huff 765 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Lorberbaum v. Huff 765 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
review denied (Minn. Sept.
In Re Margolis Revocable Trust 765 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
review denied (Minn. Sept.
Becker v. Mayo Foundation 737 N.W.2d 200 Minn. 2007
Becker v. Mayo Foundation 737 N.W.2d 200 Minn. 2007
Further, the court of appeals has held that “[a] party may not raise an issue for the first time in a motion for new trial.”
In Re Trusts a & B Created Under the Last Will & Testament of Divine 672 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re Trusts a & B Created Under the Last Will & Testament of Divine 672 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In an action for breach of fiduciary duty by a professional trustee, “the plaintiff ‘must present evidence of the applicable standard of care, and that the standard of care was breached.’ ” , 406 n. 8 (Minn.App.2001) (quoting Wartnick v. Moss & Barnett, ), review denied (Minn. Sept.