Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Jones, 347 N.W.2d 796.
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of: C. W. A., Child.
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Circumstan tial evidence indicating the defendant’s participation in the crime is sufficient to corrobora te the accomplice’s testimony.” ().
- State v. Ortega 813 N.W.2d 86 Minn. 2012
- State v. Ortega 813 N.W.2d 86 Minn. 2012
- State v. Hull 788 N.W.2d 91 Minn. 2010
- State v. Hull 788 N.W.2d 91 Minn. 2010
- State v. Jackson 770 N.W.2d 470 Minn. 2009
- State v. Jackson 770 N.W.2d 470 Minn. 2009
- In Re the Welfare of S.J.J. 755 N.W.2d 316 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
- In Re the Welfare of S.J.J. 755 N.W.2d 316 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
- State v. Clark 755 N.W.2d 241 Minn. 2008
- State v. Reed 737 N.W.2d 572 Minn. 2007
-
State v. Reed
737 N.W.2d 572
Minn. 2007
“Circumstantial evidence indicating the defendant’s participation in the crime is sufficient to corroborate the accomplice’s testimony.” , 532 (Minn.1995) ().
- State v. Dobbins 725 N.W.2d 492 Minn. 2006
- State v. Dobbins 725 N.W.2d 492 Minn. 2006
- State v. Edwards 717 N.W.2d 405 Minn. 2006
- State v. Edwards 717 N.W.2d 405 Minn. 2006
- State v. White 684 N.W.2d 500 Minn. 2004
- State v. White 684 N.W.2d 500 Minn. 2004
- State v. Busse 644 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 2002
- State v. Lundberg 575 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
-
State v. Lundberg
575 N.W.2d 589
Minn. Ct. App. 1998
see also State v. Armstrong, 257 Minn. 295, 309 , 101 N-.W.2d 398, 407 (1960) (concluding Minn. Stat. § 634.04 does not require state to produce corroborative evidence that by itself would be sufficient to sustain conviction).
- State v. Auchampach 540 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 1995
- State v. Auchampach 540 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 1995
- State v. Green 538 N.W.2d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-
State v. Green
538 N.W.2d 698
Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-02 (Minn.1984) for the proposition that where the jury instructions are clear, the lack of a more specific instruction is not error.
- State v. Ostrem 535 N.W.2d 916 Minn. 1995
-
State v. Ostrem
535 N.W.2d 916
Minn. 1995
To impose liability under the aiding and abetting statute, the state must show “some knowing role in the commission of the crime by a defendant who takes no steps to thwart its completion.” ().
- State v. McKenzie 532 N.W.2d 210 Minn. 1995
- State v. McKenzie 532 N.W.2d 210 Minn. 1995
- State v. Bowles 530 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1995
- State v. Bowles 530 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1995
- State v. Russell 503 N.W.2d 110 Minn. 1993
-
State v. Russell
503 N.W.2d 110
Minn. 1993
The state meets its burden, however, by showing “ ‘some knowing role in the commission of the crime’ by a defendant who ‘takes no steps to thwart its completion.’ ” ().
- State v. Hart 477 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- State v. Hart 477 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- State v. Saybolt 461 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
-
State v. Saybolt
461 N.W.2d 729
Minn. Ct. App. 1990
1068, 1071 , 25 L.Ed.2d 368 (1970); The standard of review on a claim for insufficient evidence in a
- State v. Schaeffer 452 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- State v. Schaeffer 452 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- State v. Fidel 451 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- State v. Fidel 451 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- State v. Carpenter 447 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- State v. Carpenter 447 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- State v. Hysell 449 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- State v. Hysell 449 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- State v. Thieman 439 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1989