Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Frederiksen v. Frederiksen, 368 N.W.2d 769.
-
In re the Marriage of: William T. Bienemann, petitioner, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Wife cites to cases in which we affirmed a district court’s invasi on of nonmarital property after determining that one spouse would suffer undue hardship: (affirming award of 10% of husband’s nonmarital property when parties were married 28 years and wife had serious health problems); (affirming award of 40% of husband’s nonmarital asset when wife spent 30 -year marriage as homemaker, lacked
-
In re the Marriage of: Jennifer Perrill, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
0 in marital property and had net annual income of approximately $21,600); , 30 (Minn. App. 1985) (affirming district court’s invasion of appellant’s nonmarital property where appellant had a net worth of a pproximately $1 million, while respondent could barely speak English, lacked employable skills, and had a net worth of $5,000); (affirming district court’s invasion of appellant’s nonmarital property where appellant was a successful farme r, while respondent suffered from serious emotional an
-
In re the Marriage of: David Joseph Williams, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
15, 2011), in support of his argument.
- In re the Marriage of: Sharon Alice Gribble v. William Daniel Gribble Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
In re the Marriage of: Sharon Alice Gribble v. William Daniel Gribble
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
To the contrary, Passolt cites Fredericksen v. 9 Fredericksen, where we held that a district court’s adoption of a step-decrease to account for a maintenance recipient’s predicted receipt of social security payments was “too speculative” and “premature” because of “the uncertainties in the benefits she will receive.”
- Marriage of Passolt v. Passolt 804 N.W.2d 18 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
- Marriage of Passolt v. Passolt 804 N.W.2d 18 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
- Lee v. Lee 749 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-
Lee v. Lee
749 N.W.2d 51
Minn. Ct. App. 2008
(remanding to determine ability of maintenance obligor to provide insurance to secure maintenance payments without imposing an unfair burden on obligor when the record contained no information on obligor’s insurability or cost of insurance).
- Marriage of Reynolds v. Reynolds 498 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-
Marriage of Reynolds v. Reynolds
498 N.W.2d 266
Minn. Ct. App. 1993
a finding of undue hardship was upheld where the respondent suffered from serious emotional and physical problems which would probably necessitate costly medical treatment in the future.
- Jlb v. Teb 474 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- J.L.B. v. T.E.B. 474 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Jlb v. Teb 474 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- J.L.B. v. T.E.B. 474 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Marriage of Reinke v. Reinke 464 N.W.2d 513 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
-
Marriage of Reinke v. Reinke
464 N.W.2d 513
Minn. Ct. App. 1990
year-old to obtain employment and amount she can earn are speculative after 29 years of marriage, award should be permanent, subject to modification if circumstances change); (where similar uncertainties existed order should have been left “open for modification rather than building in automatic reduction”); (trial court erred when it ordered permanent maintenance reduced in anticipation of wife’s gainful employment and eligibility for social security instead of ordering permanent maintenance su
- Schreifels v. Schreifels 450 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
-
Schreifels v. Schreifels
450 N.W.2d 372
Minn. Ct. App. 1990
(holding under similar circumstances that step reduction was unwarranted).
- Marriage of Fastner v. Fastner 427 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
Marriage of Fastner v. Fastner
427 N.W.2d 691
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
29, 1985) (no abuse of discretion in refusal to order party to obtain life insurance to secure child support obligation); (trial court abused discretion in refusing to order security under “exceptional” circumstances of case: maintenance recipient had severe emotional and physical problems, including narcolepsy, chemical dependency, obesity, and depression).
- Marriage of Miller v. Miller 415 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Miller v. Miller 415 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Bury v. Bury 416 N.W.2d 133 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Bury v. Bury 416 N.W.2d 133 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Meyers v. Meyers 409 N.W.2d 532 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Marriage of Meyers v. Meyers
409 N.W.2d 532
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The standard for determining propriety of an award of attorney’s fees is “a party’s need for financial assistance in order to protect his or her rights in dissolution proceedings.”
- Davis v. Davis 394 N.W.2d 519 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Davis v. Davis
394 N.W.2d 519
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
The standard for determining the propriety of an award of attorney fees is “a party’s need for financial assistance to enable him to protect his rights in dissolution proceedings.”
- Marriage of Erler v. Erler 390 N.W.2d 316 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Marriage of Erler v. Erler
390 N.W.2d 316
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(citing Solon, d at 397 ).
- Wende v. Wende 386 N.W.2d 271 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Wende v. Wende
386 N.W.2d 271
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
The standard for determining ' the propriety of an award of attorney’s fees is “a party’s need for financial assistance in order to protect his or her rights in dissolution proceedings.”
- Erdahl v. Erdahl 384 N.W.2d 566 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Erdahl v. Erdahl
384 N.W.2d 566
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
She asserts that she is entitled to a
- Marriage of Schultz v. Schultz 383 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Schultz v. Schultz 383 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Pekarek v. Wilking 380 N.W.2d 161 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Pekarek v. Wilking 380 N.W.2d 161 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Dicks v. Dicks 380 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Dicks v. Dicks 380 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Moon v. Moon 378 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Marriage of Moon v. Moon 378 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Marriage of Cummings v. Cummings 376 N.W.2d 726 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Marriage of Cummings v. Cummings 376 N.W.2d 726 Minn. Ct. App. 1985