Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite City of Duluth v. State, 390 N.W.2d 757.

45 citing documents.

Peter Stalland, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
substantial commitments have been made.” (explaining, also in an eminent-domain case, that procedural defects will not invalidate the city’s decision if they are insubstantial).
In re the Pamela Andreas Stisser Grantor Trust 818 N.W.2d 495 Minn. 2012
In re the Pamela Andreas Stisser Grantor Trust 818 N.W.2d 495 Minn. 2012
(“[A] [district] court’s findings of fact will be subject to review de novo where those findings are based on documentary evidence equally available to this court.”).
State ex rel. Commissioner of Transportation v. Kettleson 801 N.W.2d 160 Minn. 2011
State ex rel. Commissioner of Transportation v. Kettleson 801 N.W.2d 160 Minn. 2011
(noting that historically, “the court has used the words ‘public use’ interchangeably with the words ‘public purpose’ ”).
City of Willmar v. Kvam 769 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
City of Willmar v. Kvam 769 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
City of Granite Falls v. Soo Line Railroad 742 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
City of Granite Falls v. Soo Line Railroad 742 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Lundell v. COOPERATIVE POWER ASS'N 707 N.W.2d 376 Minn. 2006
Lundell v. COOPERATIVE POWER ASS'N 707 N.W.2d 376 Minn. 2006
Housing & Redevelopment Authority Ex Rel. City of Richfield v. Walser Auto Sales, Inc. 641 N.W.2d 885 Minn. 2002
Housing & Redevelopment Authority Ex Rel. City of Richfield v. Walser Auto Sales, Inc. 641 N.W.2d 885 Minn. 2002
Dokman v. County of Hennepin 637 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Dokman v. County of Hennepin 637 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Housing & Redevelopment Authority in & for Richfield v. Walser Auto Sales, Inc. 630 N.W.2d 662 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Housing & Redevelopment Authority in & for Richfield v. Walser Auto Sales, Inc. 630 N.W.2d 662 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Condemnation Petition “Our scope of review in a condemnation case is very narrow.” County of Dakota (C.P.46-06) v. City of Lakeville, ().
In Re Rapp 621 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re Rapp 621 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
See, e. g., Lieser v. Town of St.
Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority v. Reiling 610 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority v. Reiling 610 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
(construing statutes governing acquisition of property and creation of industrial development districts by port authorities; court concluded that public hearing and findings that industrial development district was proper and desirable were not prerequisites to exercising power of eminent domain under chap
Itasca County v. Carpenter 602 N.W.2d 887 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Itasca County v. Carpenter 602 N.W.2d 887 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Town of Fayal v. City of Eveleth 587 N.W.2d 524 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Town of Fayal v. City of Eveleth 587 N.W.2d 524 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
County of Stearns v. Voller 584 N.W.2d 800 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
County of Stearns v. Voller 584 N.W.2d 800 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Minneapolis Community Development Agency v. Opus Northwest, LLC 582 N.W.2d 596 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Matter of MCDA 582 N.W.2d 596 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Matter of MCDA 582 N.W.2d 596 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Minneapolis Community Development Agency v. Opus Northwest, LLC 582 N.W.2d 596 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
County of Dakota (CP 46-06) v. Lakeville 559 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
County of Dakota (CP 46-06) v. Lakeville 559 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Wegner v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance 479 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 1991
Wegner v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance 479 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 1991
Wegner v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. 464 N.W.2d 543 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Wegner v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. 464 N.W.2d 543 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Mortenson v. State 446 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Mortenson v. State 446 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Re the Condemnation by the Minneapolis Community Development Agency 439 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 1989
In Re the Condemnation by the Minneapolis Community Development Agency 439 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 1989
See, State v. Anderson, 220 Minn. 139, 146
City of Duluth, St. Louis County v. P.F.L., Inc. 431 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
City of Duluth, St. Louis County v. P.F.L., Inc. 431 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
City of Duluth, St. Louis County v. Alexander 404 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
City of Duluth, St. Louis County v. Alexander 404 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
V, XIV; Minn. Const. art. I, § 13; -64 (Minn.1986).