Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Markel v. City of Circle Pines, 479 N.W.2d 382.

45 citing documents.

Joni T. White, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
John’ s Lutheran Church, ).
In the Matter of: Karen M. Erickson. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
John’s Lutheran Church, ().
In the Matter of the Appeal of the Denial of Renewal of Therapeutic Massage License Numbers EMT-13217 and … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
We review factual findings “in the light most favorable to the decision, and if there is evidence reasonably tending to sustain th em, they will not be disturbed.” Markel v. City of Circle Pines , - 84 (Minn. 1992).
Scott Souter, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
The Minnesota Supreme Court has held that “[c]onduct which results in the loss of a license necessary for the p erformance of normal job duties is misconduct within the meaning of the unemployment benefit scheme, so as to render the employee ineligible for the receipt of unemployment benefits.” Markel v. City of Circle Pines
Superior Glass, Inc. v. Johnson 896 N.W.2d 137 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Superior Glass, Inc. v. Johnson 896 N.W.2d 137 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A16-1504 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Clifford G. Menyweather, Relator v. Fedtech, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development 872 N.W.2d 543 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Clifford G. Menyweather, Relator v. Fedtech, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development 872 N.W.2d 543 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
John’s Lutheran Church, ().
Robert R. Adams, Relator v. Select Communications, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Robert R. Adams, Relator v. Select Communications, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
John’s Lutheran Church, ().
Stagg v. Vintage Place Inc. 796 N.W.2d 312 Minn. 2011
Stagg v. Vintage Place Inc. 796 N.W.2d 312 Minn. 2011
Corp., ( -84 (Minn.1992)).
Lawrence v. Ratzlaff Motor Express Inc. 785 N.W.2d 819 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Lawrence v. Ratzlaff Motor Express Inc. 785 N.W.2d 819 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
a case in which the supreme court addressed an employee’s loss of a driver’s license needed for employment due to the employee’s alcohol-related driving offense.
Irvine v. St. John's Lutheran Church of Mound 779 N.W.2d 101 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Irvine v. St. John's Lutheran Church of Mound 779 N.W.2d 101 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Jenkins v. American Express Financial Corp. 721 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 2006
Jenkins v. American Express Financial Corp. 721 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 2006
Jenkins v. AMERICAN EXPRESS FINANCIAL CORP. 702 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Jenkins v. AMERICAN EXPRESS FINANCIAL CORP. 702 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Vargas v. Northwest Area Foundation 673 N.W.2d 200 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Vargas v. Northwest Area Foundation 673 N.W.2d 200 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Huston v. Commissioner of Employment & Economic Development 672 N.W.2d 606 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Huston v. Commissioner of Employment & Economic Development 672 N.W.2d 606 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Hayes v. K-Mart Corp. 665 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Hayes v. K-Mart Corp. 665 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Risk v. Eastside Beverage 664 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Risk v. Eastside Beverage 664 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
-84 (Minn.1992) (quotation omitted).
Romanowicz v. Consolidated Freightways Corp. 532 N.W.2d 614 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Romanowicz v. Consolidated Freightways Corp. 532 N.W.2d 614 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Ballin v. Metropolitan Transit Commission 525 N.W.2d 11 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Ballin v. Metropolitan Transit Commission 525 N.W.2d 11 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Because the fact of the conviction, whether job-related or not, of a Lottery employee affects the credibility of and reduces the public confidence in the integrity of the Lottery, Pechacek’s conviction, even though for off-duty and off-site conduct, reflects an “intentional and substantial disregard of his duties and obligations to his employer,” and he must be said to have been discharged for gross misconduct which interfered with and substantially affected his employment.
Nerby v. Talent Partners 518 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Nerby v. Talent Partners 518 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
McGowan v. Executive Express Transp.
Nieszner v. Minnesota Department of Jobs & Training 499 N.W.2d 832 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Nieszner v. Minnesota Department of Jobs & Training 499 N.W.2d 832 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Tilseth v. Midwest Lumber Co., 295 Minn. 372, 374-75
Pechacek v. Minnesota State Lottery 497 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1993
Pechacek v. Minnesota State Lottery 497 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1993
mounts to a felony * * Because the fact of the conviction, whether job-related or not, of a Lottery employee affects the credibility of and reduces public confidence in the integrity of the Lottery, Pechacek’s conviction, even though for off-duty and off-site conduct, reflects an “intentional and substantial disregard of his duties and obligations to his employer,” and he must be said to have been discharged for gross misconduct which interfered with and substantially affected his employment.
Marshall v. Commissioner of Jobs & Training 496 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Marshall v. Commissioner of Jobs & Training 496 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Peterson v. Fred Vogt & Co. 495 N.W.2d 875 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Peterson v. Fred Vogt & Co. 495 N.W.2d 875 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Miller v. International Express Corp. 495 N.W.2d 616 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Miller v. International Express Corp. 495 N.W.2d 616 Minn. Ct. App. 1993