Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of Commissioners, 617 N.W.2d 566.

246 citing documents.

Michael A. Knight v. Sean K. McGinity 868 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
Michael Klockmann, Relators v. Le Sueur County Board of Commissioners Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Michael Klockmann, Relators v. Le Sueur County Board of Commissioners Minn. Ct. App. 2015
of Comm’rs, n.5 (Minn. 2000); Picha v. Cnty.
Kenneth A. Roseland v. Joseph A. Wentzell, Attorney at Law, Richard L. Kusick, and Roseland Acres, LLC, third … 864 N.W.2d 356 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Kenneth A. Roseland, Law Offices of Richard E. Bosse, Chartered v. Joseph A. Wentzell, Attorney at Law, Richard … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Kenneth A. Roseland, Law Offices of Richard E. Bosse, Chartered v. Joseph A. Wentzell, Attorney at Law, Richard … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
Kenneth A. Roseland v. Joseph A. Wentzell, Attorney at Law, Richard L. Kusick, and Roseland Acres, LLC, third … 864 N.W.2d 356 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
Bio Wood Processing, LLC, Relator v. Rice County Board of Commissioners Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Bio Wood Processing, LLC, Relator v. Rice County Board of Commissioners Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The Bank of New York Mellon, f/k/a The Bank of New York, as Trustee for The Certificateholders of … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Bank of New York Mellon v. Keiran 863 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Bank of New York Mellon v. Keiran 863 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Of Comm'rs, (stating that, generally, "appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
The Bank of New York Mellon, f/k/a The Bank of New York, as Trustee for The Certificateholders of … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
Deborah A. Weckert, Relator v. United Healthcare Services, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Deborah A. Weckert, Relator v. United Healthcare Services, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
In re the Matter of: Calvin James Omtvedt v. Amanda Marie Jansen Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Patricia G. Mikelson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Patricia G. Mikelson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case” unless doing so would affect vested rights or result in a manifest injustice).
In re the Matter of: Calvin James Omtvedt v. Amanda Marie Jansen Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on the case”).
State of Minnesota v. Dylan Micheal Kelley 855 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Dylan Micheal Kelley 855 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 2014
of Comm'rs, ("The general rule is that appellate courts apply the law as it exists *277 at the time they rule on a case, even if the law has changed since a lower court ruled on the case.”).
Richard Hammerstad, Relator v. Princeton Auto Center, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Richard Hammerstad, Relator v. Princeton Auto Center, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
Fieseler Masonry, Inc. v. City of Mabel, Exact Construction Company, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Fieseler Masonry, Inc. v. City of Mabel, Exact Construction Company, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
John Matheson, Relator v. Progressive Action - Minnesota, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
John Matheson, Relator v. Progressive Action - Minnesota, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
Nancy Salscheider v. Allina Health System d/b/a Allina Hospitals & Clinics Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Nancy Salscheider v. Allina Health System d/b/a Allina Hospitals & Clinics Minn. Ct. App. 2014
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
Citizens State Bank Norwood Young America v. Brown 829 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Citizens State Bank Norwood Young America v. Brown 829 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
of Comm’rs, ("The general rule is that appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case_”).
County of Washington v. City of Oak Park Heights 818 N.W.2d 533 Minn. 2012
County of Washington v. City of Oak Park Heights 818 N.W.2d 533 Minn. 2012
of Comm’rs, -74 (Minn.2000).
HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc. v. Graikowski 812 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc. v. Graikowski 812 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, "appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case" unless doing so would affect vested rights or result in a manifest injustice).
Greer v. Professional Fiduciary, Inc. 792 N.W.2d 120 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Greer v. Professional Fiduciary, Inc. 792 N.W.2d 120 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
of Comm’rs, (stating the general rule that “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case” unless doing so would affect vested rights or result in manifest injustice).
Pawn America Minnesota, LLC v. City of St. Louis Park 787 N.W.2d 565 Minn. 2010
Pawn America Minnesota, LLC v. City of St. Louis Park 787 N.W.2d 565 Minn. 2010
of Comm’rs, (stating that "[ajmendment of a zoning ordinance is a legislative act”); Honn, d at 417 (stating that the enactment of a zoning ordinance is a legislative act).
City of North Oaks v. Sarpal 784 N.W.2d 857 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
City of North Oaks v. Sarpal 784 N.W.2d 857 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Anderson v. COUNTY OF LYON 784 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Anderson v. COUNTY OF LYON 784 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
of Comm’rs, (); see also Minn.Stat.
Big Lake Ass'n v. Saint Louis County Planning Commission 761 N.W.2d 487 Minn. 2009
Big Lake Ass'n v. Saint Louis County Planning Commission 761 N.W.2d 487 Minn. 2009
of Comm’rs, , 574 & n. 5 (Minn.2000) (noting that a quasi-judicial decision of a county zoning authority is reviewable by writ of certiorari, “because the legislature has not provided for judicial review of zoning decisions of county boards in the district court”).
In Re the Expulsion of N.Y.B. 750 N.W.2d 318 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In Re the Expulsion of N.Y.B. 750 N.W.2d 318 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
of Comm’rs, (stating that remand for findings must be limited to protect individual subject to decision from post hoc rationale).
U.S. Home Corp. v. Zimmerman Stucco & Plaster, Inc. 749 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
U.S. Home Corp. v. Zimmerman Stucco & Plaster, Inc. 749 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
of Commrs., (“The general rule [is] that courts apply the law existing at the time of [the] decision....”).
Marriage of Goldman v. Greenwood 748 N.W.2d 279 Minn. 2008