Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of Commissioners, 617 N.W.2d 566.

247 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Application of Michael Schuster and Lonny Witkofsky for a Conditional Use Permit Minn. Ct. App. 2026
of Comm’rs, (explaining that a “[r]uling on a [CUP] application is a quasi-judicial act” and that, when “a quasi-judicial zoning decision is made by a county board, it is reviewable by writ of certiorari” (footnote omitted)); see also Block, d at 177 (“Quasi-judicial decisions by a county board rega
A Resolution Reaffirming the Issuance of a Cannabis Retail Registration to Jigar Patel, DBA Nature Creation Minn. Ct. App. 2026
of Comm’rs, (“Legislative acts are not reviewable by certiorari in the court of appeals, but by a direct action in district court.”); see also Brown, d at 497– 98 (concluding that a relator’s arguments “challeng[ing] the city’s decision to make policy and procedural changes to its process for determin
Jacob Schlichter, et al v. City of Albert Lea, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2026
of Comm’rs, 575 (Minn. 2000).
Independent School District No. 281, Robbinsdale v. City of New Hope Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Matter of a Public Safety Officer Kent Michael Vnuk (Deceased) Minn. Ct. App. 2026
of Comm’rs, (stating that generally “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
In re the Marriage of: Diana Jakubauskiene v. Robertas Jakubauskas Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Matter of the Application of Jason Kitzman and Rani Kitzman for a Conditional Use Permit Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Housing First Minnesota v. City of Corcoran (A25-1220). Housing First Minnesota, vs. City of Dayton (A25-1221) Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Marriage of: Todd Charles Sherette v. Melissa Ann Sherette Minn. Ct. App. 2026
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate 3 The J&D reflects the parties’ agreed-to and stipulated valuation date of March 31, 2023.
State of Minnesota v. Zachariah Christopher Whitehead Minn. Ct. App. 2026
of Comm’rs, (stating in the context of a civil statute, appellate courts generally “apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. J. W. and L. S. G., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. J. W. and L. S. G., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Mark Wocken v. Stearns County Board of Commissioners Minn. Ct. App. 2026
of Comm’rs, n.5 (Minn. 2000) (stating that zoning decisions by county boards are reviewable by writ of certiorari).
In the Marriage of: Sarah Nicole Smith v. Jonathan George Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Marriage of: Sarah Nicole Smith v. Jonathan George Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2026
of Comm’rs, (noting that, generally, appellate courts apply the version of a statute in effect when we decide an appeal, but an exception applies “when rights affected by the amended law were vested before the change in the law”).
In Re the Marriage of: Erica Leigh Riehm v. Harold Andrew Riehm Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Matter of the Denial of Line of Duty Death Benefits for Dallas Edeburn Minn. Ct. App. 2026
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child(ren) of: J. L. C. R. and M. A. C. … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
Kidane Sante Shulbe v. Ashley Rose Henke Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Kidane Sante Shulbe v. Ashley Rose Henke Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
A25-1125 In re Cottonwood County’s Decision on the Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Sioux … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re Defense and Indemnification of Alexander Vladimir Brown Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re Defense and Indemnification of Alexander Vladimir Brown Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
A25-1125 In re Cottonwood County’s Decision on the Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Sioux … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, & n.5 (Minn. 2000).
In re City of St. Paul’s Decision on the Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Of Comm’rs, (“Legislative acts are not reviewable by certiorari in the court of appeals, but by a direct action in district court.”).
City of Brooklyn Park, a Municipal Corporation v. Michael G. Doleman Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. R. and F. F., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
State of Minnesota v. Ahmedfowzi Haji Ismail Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, appellate courts “apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
In the Matter of the Application of Janet T. Lamkin, to Register the Title to Certain Land Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
Richard Whitman v. Highland Management Group Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
In the Marriage of: Roberta Jo Nickel v. Joshua Peter Nickel, County of Cottonwood Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
Brianne Goad v. City of Duluth, vs. Sinnott Blacktop, LLC, Third-Party Defendant Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Thomas Noree v. Philip Wong LLC, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
Joy Litke, et al v. Home Heritage Holdings, LLC, et al., Larson Abstract Company, Inc., vs. Wausau Homes, … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
Samantha Wakasugi v. 3M Company Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, d 566, 575 (Minn. 2000).
In the Matter of the Application of Marco Quinton Hanlon for a Change of Name Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Ingrid Alexander v. City of Minneapolis, and Matrix Development LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Ingrid Alexander v. City of Minneapolis, and Matrix Development LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Application of Jesus Adrian Soto for a Change of Name of Minor Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
Guardianship of the Person of Lance Alvin Melser, In re the Guardianship of Cory James Wojtowicz Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
Dan Murphy v. City of Minneapolis, Beard Manager, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on 4 comprehensive plan is a “compilation of policy statements, goals, standards, and maps for guiding the physical, social and economic development” of a municipality.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Shawn Jamison Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
Alex Lancaster, Relator v. Department of Human Services Minn. 2025
Alex Lancaster, Relator v. Department of Human Services Minn. 2025
of Comm’rs, 574 n.5 (Minn. 2000) (providing that a county board’s “[r]uling on a conditional use permit application is a quasi-judicial act” because “the legislature has not provided for judicial review of zoning decisions of county boards in the district court as it has for zoning decisions” by other governing bodies)
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. I. G. and O. C., C. D. … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: X. M. B. and J. C. B.-G., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Douglas James Williams v. Musu Lamin Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
Aaron Olson v. Community Action Partnership of Hennepin County (CAPSH), State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, 3 application for energy assistance “in the manner [in] which it had previously done”—via email—and therefore failed to provide a reasonable accommodation for his disability.
In the Matter of QC Training Services, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
ExteNet Systems, LLC v. Sherman Associates, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
of Comm’rs, n.2 (Minn. 2000) (“If a road project requires 5 alteration of the public right-of- way, utilities whose equipment is within the right -of-way pay the cost of relocation.”).