Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of Commissioners, 617 N.W.2d 566.

246 citing documents.

Discover Bank, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
In re J. L. G. 924 N.W.2d 9 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re J. L. G. 924 N.W.2d 9 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
of Comm'rs , , 575 (Minn. 2000).
Jeremy Richard Ullrich, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re An Order Finding Certain Facts and Ordering the Denial of a Conditional Use Permit United States … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re G. J. Parents F. 920 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re G. J. Parents F. 920 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
of Comm'rs , , 575 (Minn. 2000) ("The general rule is that appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case.").
A18-0333 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
of Comm’rs, (“The general rule is that appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case.”).
Muschik v. Conner-Muschik 920 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Muschik v. Conner-Muschik 920 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
of Comm'rs , , 575 (Minn. 2000).
Paul King, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Robert F. Goerdt, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
In the Matter of the Determination of the Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Lower Pool … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
of Comm’rs, (stating that the supreme court has previously remanded cases to “afford an opportunity to prov ide findings sufficient to enable judicial review ”).
Mathew Davis, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
of Comm’ rs, (quotation omitted); see also Metro 500, Inc. v. City of Brooklyn Park , 297 Minn. 294, 299, (alluding to “danger” of permitting local government body “after several months of thought to present reasons perhaps totally unrelated to the actual reasons for denying the p
Collegians for a Constructive Tomorrow, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Custody of M. M. L. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
of Comm’rs, (stating that “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case,” but that “an exception to th is rule exists when rights affected by the amended law were vested before the change in the law”).
In re In re Annexation of Certain Real Prop. to the City of Proctor from Midway Twp. 910 N.W.2d 460 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re In re Annexation of Certain Real Prop. to the City of Proctor from Midway Twp. 910 N.W.2d 460 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
of Comm'rs , , 575 (Minn. 2000) (stating that, generally, "appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case").
Kristi Rosenquist, et al., Relators, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
of Comm’rs, n.5 (Minn. 2000); Picha v. Cty.
Minnesota Solar, LLC, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Luz Hernandez, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
of Comm’rs , (stating that, ge nerally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
A Resolution Setting Forth Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Denying S. M. Hentges & … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Thomas Davison, et al., Relators, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Partners in Nutrition's Appeal of Disapproval of Site Expansion in the CACFP Program 896 N.W.2d 564 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Partners in Nutrition's Appeal of Disapproval of Site Expansion in the CACFP Program 896 N.W.2d 564 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Agate Lake Association, et al. Relators, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Sno-Barons Snowmobile Club, Inc., Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of Unity Health Care, Class F Home License No. 352187 and Unity Home Care, Inc., … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of Unity Health Care, Class F Home License No. 352187 and Unity Home Care, Inc., … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
of Comm’rs, (noting that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
In re the Marriage of: Todd James Lindsey v. Shirley June Lindsey Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Todd James Lindsey v. Shirley June Lindsey Minn. Ct. App. 2016
of Comm’rs, (noting that, generally, appellate courts apply the version of a 3 presumed not to be an obligor for purposes of a child support order .
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Rachel B. Sabin. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Rachel B. Sabin. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case” unless doing so would affect vested rights or result in a manifest injustice).
John D. Perschbacher, Relator (A15-0619), (A15-2002) v. Freeborn County Board of Commissioners, A15-619 883 N.W.2d 637 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
John D. Perschbacher, Relator (A15-0619), (A15-2002) v. Freeborn County Board of Commissioners, A15-619 883 N.W.2d 637 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Brian Winczewski, Relator v. Becker County Board of Commissioners, Osage Sportsman Club, Inc., n/k/a Osage Sportsmens Club, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Brian Winczewski, Relator v. Becker County Board of Commissioners, Osage Sportsman Club, Inc., n/k/a Osage Sportsmens Club, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Mark R. Zweber v. Credit River Township 882 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 2016
Mark R. Zweber v. Credit River Township 882 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 2016
In re the Matter of: Eric Joseph Vacko v. Teri Ann Shults Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Matter of: Eric Joseph Vacko v. Teri Ann Shults Minn. Ct. App. 2016
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, courts apply the law in effect at the time they make their decision, unless doing so would alter vested rights or result in manifest injustice).
In re the Marriage of: Timothy Michael Kopp v. Christina Ann Burton Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Timothy Michael Kopp v. Christina Ann Burton Minn. Ct. App. 2016
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, courts apply the law in effect at the time they make their decision, unless doing so would alter vested rights or result in manifest injustice).
In re the Marriage of: Christina Marie Rexine v. Joey Lee Rexine Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Christina Marie Rexine v. Joey Lee Rexine Minn. Ct. App. 2015
of Comm’rs, (citation omitted) (“The general rule is that appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case, even if the law has changed since a lower court ruled on the case.
Jeffrey A. August, Relator v. Chisago County Board of Commissioners 868 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Tammy Loncorich, Relators v. Kevin Buss, McLeod County Board of Commissioners 868 N.W.2d 755 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jeffrey A. August, Relator v. Chisago County Board of Commissioners 868 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
of Comm’rs, d 566, 574 n.5 (Minn. 2000); Picha v. Cnty.
Tammy Loncorich, Relators v. Kevin Buss, McLeod County Board of Commissioners 868 N.W.2d 755 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Michael A. Knight v. Sean K. McGinity 868 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 2015