Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Levine, 624 N.W.2d 585.

16 citing documents.

Eddie Markeith Frazier, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See State v. Stewart , (observing that defendant’s actions were inconsistent with heat of passion because rather than “clouded reason or weakened willpower,” they demonstrated “a rational, calculating and controlled emotional state of mind—attempting to avoid detection for the crime he just committed”).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-89 (Minn. 2001) (discussing heat-of-passion manslaughter).
Minn. 2020
See State v. Stewart , (M inn.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
see State v. Radke , 8 (Minn. 2012) (finding no error in the district court’s denial of a heat -of-passion jury instruction when “there was no rational basis upon which a jury could have found [the defendant] acted in the subjective heat of passion”).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(holding that “attempting to avoid detection” for a crime just committed demonstrates a “rational, calculating, and controlled emotional state of mind”).
State of Minnesota v. Ronald Matthew Quiceno Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State v. Radke 821 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 2012
State v. Hohenwald 815 N.W.2d 823 Minn. 2012
(concluding that the defendant did not act in the heat of passion when he made “rational” and “calculating” attempts to avoid detection for the crime he had just committed).
Stewart v. State 764 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 2009
State v. Van Keuren 759 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 2008
Sands v. Commissioner of Public Safety 744 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Anderson 720 N.W.2d 854 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
State v. Hannon 703 N.W.2d 498 Minn. 2005
State v. Al-Naseer 690 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 2005
(holding that as a matter of law there was no rational basis for jury to find that the killing was in the heat of passion); (holding that as a matter of law there was “no rational basis for a jury to find that [the defendant] killed [the victim] in the heat of passion”); and Nystrom, d at 262 (holding that the defendant failed to establish words or acts sufficient to provoke a person of ordinary self-control).
State v. Quick 659 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 2003
State v. Carney 649 N.W.2d 455 Minn. 2002