Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Herem, 384 N.W.2d 880.

69 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Charlene Marie Waldron Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Charlene Marie Waldron Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Safety, (“[U]pon arriving at the scene of an accident an officer need not give a Miranda warning to a person suspected of DWI.”); -71 (Minn. App. 2007) (stating that asking a DWI suspect about alcohol consumption does not constitute an interrogation); (observing that an “officer’s subjective intent or .
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
a deputy sheriff stopped a motorcyclist and asked him several questions, such as whether he knew that he was speeding, whether he had seen the patrol car, and whether he had been drinking.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
which was decided after Berkemer, a deputy sheriff stopped a motorcyclist and asked him several questions, such as whether he knew that he was speeding, whether he had seen the patrol car, and wh ether he had been drinking.
State of Minnesota v. Terry Gordon Wurtz Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Terry Gordon Wurtz Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Berkemer v. McCarthy, 468 U.S. 420, 440 (1984)
Justin Steven Luedke v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Justin Steven Luedke v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. July 16, 2002).
Jeremy Ray Johnson v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jeremy Ray Johnson v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Paul Richard Dehn Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Paul Richard Dehn Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jimmy Lee Morris Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Jimmy Lee Morris Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Vonderharr 733 N.W.2d 847 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Vonderharr 733 N.W.2d 847 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Askerooth 681 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 2004
Explained State v. Askerooth 681 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 2004
For example, in supporting a contraiy proposition, the special concurrence cites Moffatt, d at 120
State v. Malik 552 N.W.2d 730 Minn. 1996
State v. Malik 552 N.W.2d 730 Minn. 1996
The court reasoned that “Malik was subject to only a routine traffic stop when he admitted there was marijuana in the car.”
State v. Hince 540 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 1995
State v. Hince 540 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 1995
3517, 3520 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1275 (1983))
In Re the Welfare of M.E.P. 523 N.W.2d 913 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
In Re the Welfare of M.E.P. 523 N.W.2d 913 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
884 n. 2 (Minn.1986) (a Miranda warning need be given only if a reasonable person would understand that they were not free to leave).
State v. Champion 517 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Champion 517 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
1526, 1529 , 128 L.Ed.2d 293 (1994)
State v. VanWagner 504 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 1993
State v. VanWagner 504 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 1993
State v. Walsh 495 N.W.2d 602 Minn. 1993
State v. Walsh 495 N.W.2d 602 Minn. 1993
State v. Voigt 486 N.W.2d 793 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Voigt 486 N.W.2d 793 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Rosse 478 N.W.2d 482 Minn. 1991
State v. Rosse 478 N.W.2d 482 Minn. 1991
State, City of St. Paul v. Lynch 477 N.W.2d 743 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State, City of St. Paul v. Lynch 477 N.W.2d 743 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
at 3149 ; (police officer’s brief interroga *746 tion of the defendant in his patrol car at the scene of a traffic stop was not custodial interrogation); (when police officers stop a person in a car who is suspected of committing a felony, the officers mu
State v. White 468 N.W.2d 556 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
McDonnell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 460 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Moffatt 450 N.W.2d 116 Minn. 1990
State v. Moffatt 450 N.W.2d 116 Minn. 1990
Additionally, where a stopped motorist was placed in a squad car.
State v. Ronnebaum 449 N.W.2d 722 Minn. 1990
State v. Ronnebaum 449 N.W.2d 722 Minn. 1990
3138, 3151 , 82 L.Ed.2d 317 (1984); -84 (Minn.1986).
State v. Masloski 430 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Masloski 430 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
(ordinary traffic stop, including asking the driver to sit in the squad car, does not constitute an arrest).
State v. Robinson 427 N.W.2d 217 Minn. 1988
State v. Robinson 427 N.W.2d 217 Minn. 1988
See, (the record furnished failed to establish prejudicial error).
State v. Norberg 423 N.W.2d 733 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Norberg 423 N.W.2d 733 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Martinson 422 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 1988