Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Jola, 409 N.W.2d 17.

19 citing documents.

Paul Scott Seeman, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
ota Crime Victims Reparations Board “may request restitution on behalf of a victim, which may be considered to be both on its own behalf and on behalf of the victim” (quotations omitted)); see also State v. Beganovic , (affirming district court’s restitution award to insurance company), aff’d on other grounds, (upholding a restitution award to an insurance company that reimbursed a victim for losses).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See, (affirming district court’s restitution award to insurance company), aff’d on other grounds , (same).
Aretina Tiaira Williams, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
d 17, 19 (Minn. App. 1987).
A21-0480 Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
The district court denied restitution to Philadelphia Insurance because it concluded that a restitution award would unjustly enrich Philadelphia Insurance because it had charged 180 Degrees insurance premiums “that are determined in contemplation of the risk [it] assume[s] when [it] agrees[s] to provide protection to insured parties.” and rejected it as “[i]ngenious but specious.” Here, as in Jola, Philadelphia Insurance sustained an economic loss when it paid 180 Degrees for the loss that it su
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. William Heminchi Underhill Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. William Heminchi Underhill Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(affirming a restitution award where no specific findings were made on the defendant’s ability to pay and noting “[t]he purpose of restitution is to compensate the victim”).
State of Minnesota v. Doan Meshell Engel Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Doan Meshell Engel Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State v. Miller 842 N.W.2d 474 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Miller 842 N.W.2d 474 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Keehn 554 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Keehn 554 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Anderson 507 N.W.2d 245 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Anderson 507 N.W.2d 245 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
(adjustment to restitution may be made if it becomes impracticable in future).
State v. O'BRIEN 459 N.W.2d 131 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. O'BRIEN 459 N.W.2d 131 Minn. Ct. App. 1990