Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Hickman, 491 N.W.2d 673.

20 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Jeremy Douglas Brandt Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Brandt argues that the deputy’s observation of the temporary permit dispelled any reasonable, articulable suspicion of criminal activity and that we must reverse the district court’s rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Devonte Rayon Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Melissa Ann Lorsung v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Lisa Marie Hellerud-Schuth Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Clyde Lee Reyes, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Derrick Devon Turner v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State v. Hickman , rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Levar Randolph Mitchell Minn. Ct. App. 2020
675 (Minn. App. 1992) (explaining that o nce reasonable suspicion of criminal activity has been dispelled, an investigative seizure must end), review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Christian Alfo Cano Fernandez Minn. Ct. App. 2019
To support his claim, Fernandez cites State v. Hickman , review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Aaron Michael Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2018
d 673, 675 (Minn. App. 1992), review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Deron Shandell Murphy Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(holding that an officer’s reasonable articulable suspicion of driving with an expired vehicle registration was dispelled when the officer observed a valid temporary permit on the vehicle before approaching the driver ), review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Gerald Michael Feran, II Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Paula Geraldine Reyes Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In making this argument, review denied (Minn. Dec.
Mitchell Frank Mack v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Mitchell Frank Mack v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Dec.
State v. Cox 807 N.W.2d 447 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Cox 807 N.W.2d 447 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
(holding that it is unconstitutional for an officer to question a driver after the reasonable suspicion on which a stop is based has been dispelled).
State v. Lopez 631 N.W.2d 810 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Lopez 631 N.W.2d 810 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
The district court relied on this court’s which held that it was an unconstitutional intrusion for an officer to ask for a person’s driver’s license after the validity of the traffic stop had expired: [Officer] Doran testified that he stopped Hickman only because of the expired registration sticker.
State v. Shellito 594 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Shellito 594 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
review denied (Minn.Dec.