Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Hestekin v. Hestekin, 587 N.W.2d 308.

30 citing documents.

In re the Custody of the Child of: Justin Steiner v. Nicole Lynn Patten Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See Hestekin v. Hestekin , (“In the event the court finds circumstances that might permit vacating the judgment, its decision on the question of whether vacation is an appropriate remedy must be upheld in the absence of an abuse of the trial c ourt’s discretion.”).
In re the Marriage of: Ryan Edward Nagle v. Maureen Mary Nagle Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(“Unless they are clearly erroneous, we must affirm the [district] court’s findings of fact on the question[] of whether or not the judgment was prompted by fraud .
In re the Marriage of: Christine Marie Salvosa v. Alan Douglas Salvosa Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(stating that vacatur of judgment and decree “is not an appropriate remedy to deal with unanticipated consequences of a settlement or inexcusable mistake”).
In re the Marriage of: Robert H. Brandtjen v. Terese M. Weitzel Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Lisa Marie Winkowski v. J. Vincent Winkowski Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Samantha Magdalena Hansen v. Richard Bradley Hansen Minn. Ct. App. 2020
ating that “[f]indings of fact, whether based on oral or documentary evidence, shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous”); (same); see also Straus v. Straus , (noting that appellate courts defer to a district court’s resolution of factual questions presented by conflicting affidavits); Hestekin v. Hestekin , (citing this aspect of Straus).
In re the Marriage of: Mary Elizabeth Moline v. Daniel Robert Moline Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In the Matter of Krista Ann Dickenson and o/b/o Minor Children v. David James Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Cf. Straus v. Straus, 254 Minn. 234, 235, 680 (1959) (noting that appellate courts defer to a 6 district court’s resolution of factual questions presented by conflicting affidavits); (citing this aspect of Straus).
In re the Marriage of: Marla Jean Knapp v. James Alan Knapp 883 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Marla Jean Knapp v. James Alan Knapp 883 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
2, without mention of rule 60.02); –11 (Minn. App. 1998) (reviewing district court’s denial of motion to vacate dissolution judgment based on duress under Minn. Stat. § 518.145, subd.
In re the Marriage of: Dontrell Valerie Thornton v. Herbert Thornton, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Dontrell Valerie Thornton v. Herbert Thornton, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
First American Title Insurance Company v. National Title Resources Corp., dba Northwest Title Agency, et al., Co-Appellants, Wayne … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
First American Title Insurance Company v. National Title Resources Corp., dba Northwest Title Agency, et al., Co-Appellants, Wayne … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: William John Braun v. Candida Marie Braun Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: William John Braun v. Candida Marie Braun Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Dawn Marie Mondus Loger v. Cory Scott Loger Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Dawn Marie Mondus Loger v. Cory Scott Loger Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Brian Leon Boucher v. Xiuwen Li Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Brian Leon Boucher v. Xiuwen Li Minn. Ct. App. 2014
William O. Bradley v. Carol M. Kelley, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Heather Santilli Gamble v. John Stebbins Gamble Minn. Ct. App. 2014
William O. Bradley v. Carol M. Kelley, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2014
d 308, 310 (Minn. App. 1998).
In re the Marriage of: Heather Santilli Gamble v. John Stebbins Gamble Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(noting that appellate courts defer to the district court’s resolution of factual issues presented by conflicting affidavits).
Marriage of Harding v. Harding 620 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Marriage of Harding v. Harding 620 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
2 elaborates slightly on the traditional standards of “mistake, fraud, or duress.” (citation omitted).
Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele 621 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele 621 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Marriage of Toughill v. Toughill 609 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Marriage of Toughill v. Toughill 609 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
(noting, historically, a party could be relieved of dissolution judgment for fraud, duress, or mistake); (stating that district courts may set aside stipulation-based dissolution judgments for fraud, duress, or mistake).