Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Hestekin v. Hestekin, 587 N.W.2d 308.
-
In re the Marriage of:
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(“Unless they are clearly erroneous, we must affirm the [district] court’s findings of fact on the question[] of whether or not the judgment was prompted by fraud .
-
In re the Marriage of: Christine Marie Salvosa, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(stating that vacatur of judgment and decree “is not an appropriate remedy to deal with unanticipated consequences of a settlement or inexcusable mistake”).
- In re the Marriage of: Robert H. Brandtjen, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
- In re the Marriage of: Lisa Marie Winkowski, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
-
In re the Marriage of: Samantha Magdalena Hansen, petitioner, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
ating that “[f]indings of fact, whether based on oral or documentary evidence, shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous”); (same); see also Straus v. Straus , (noting that appellate courts defer to a district court’s resolution of factual questions presented by conflicting affidavits); Hestekin v. Hestekin , (citing this aspect of Straus).
- In re the Marriage of: Mary Elizabeth Moline, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-
In the Matter of Krista Ann Dickenson and o/b/o Minor Children, petitioner, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Cf. Straus v. Straus, 254 Minn. 234, 235, 680 (1959) (noting that appellate courts defer to a 6 district court’s resolution of factual questions presented by conflicting affidavits); (citing this aspect of Straus).
- In re the Marria ge of: Marla Jean Knapp v. James Alan Knapp 883 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
In re the Marria ge of: Marla Jean Knapp v. James Alan Knapp
883 N.W.2d 833
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
2, without mention of rule 60.02); –11 (Minn. App. 1998) (reviewing district court’s denial of motion to vacate dissolution judgment based on duress under Minn. Stat. § 518.145, subd.
- In re the Marriage of: Dontrell Valerie Thornton v. Herbert Thornton, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- In re the Marriage of: Dontrell Valerie Thornton v. Herbert Thornton, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- First American Title Insurance Company v. National Title Resources Corp., dba Northwest Title Agency, Co-Appellants, Wayne Holstad Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- First American Title Insurance Company v. National Title Resources Corp., dba Northwest Title Agency, Co-Appellants, Wayne Holstad Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- In re the Marriage of: William John Braun v. Candida Marie Braun Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- In re the Marriage of: William John Braun v. Candida Marie Braun Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- In re the Marriage of: Dawn Marie Mondus Loger v. Cory Scott Loger Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- In re the Marriage of: Dawn Marie Mondus Loger v. Cory Scott Loger Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- In re the Marriage of: Brian Leon Boucher v. Xiuwen Li Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- In re the Marriage of: Brian Leon Boucher v. Xiuwen Li Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- William O. Bradley v. Carol M. Kelley Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- In re the Marriage of: Heather Santilli Gamble v. John Stebbins Gamble Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
William O. Bradley v. Carol M. Kelley
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
d 308, 310 (Minn. App. 1998).
-
In re the Marriage of: Heather Santilli Gamble v. John Stebbins Gamble
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(noting that appellate courts defer to the district court’s resolution of factual issues presented by conflicting affidavits).
- Marriage of Harding v. Harding 620 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
-
Marriage of Harding v. Harding
620 N.W.2d 920
Minn. Ct. App. 2001
2 elaborates slightly on the traditional standards of “mistake, fraud, or duress.” (citation omitted).
- Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele 621 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele 621 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- Marriage of Toughill v. Toughill 609 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-
Marriage of Toughill v. Toughill
609 N.W.2d 634
Minn. Ct. App. 2000
(noting, historically, a party could be relieved of dissolution judgment for fraud, duress, or mistake); (stating that district courts may set aside stipulation-based dissolution judgments for fraud, duress, or mistake).