Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Cook, 617 N.W.2d 417.

36 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
2 (2024); d 417, 420–21 (Minn. App. 2000), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
Simon Christopher Mueller, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A rule 27.03 motion may challenge a sentence as “unauthorized by law.” rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
1(a)(1)-(2) (2022), a sentencing court does not have authority to set the terms of a prisoner’s incarceration, rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Cook , review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota v. Edwin Gochingco Reyes 890 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Edwin Gochingco Reyes 890 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Nov.
John Howard Bartz v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
John Howard Bartz v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota, (A15-1247), (A15-1255) v. Randall Samuel Stempfley, (A15-1247), (A15-1255). A15-1247 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota, (A15-1247), (A15-1255) v. Randall Samuel Stempfley, (A15-1247), (A15-1255). A15-1247 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota v. Forest Grant Noggle Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Forest Grant Noggle Minn. Ct. App. 2015
9; -19 (Minn. App. 2000), review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota v. Jason Lamont Armstrong Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jason Lamont Armstrong Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Nov.
Morris Gaye Kayee v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Morris Gaye Kayee v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Nov.
Jerry Wayne Gerrard v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jerry Wayne Gerrard v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
9; review denied (Minn. Nov.
Michael Ray Whipple v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Michael Ray Whipple v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota v. David Eugene Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. David Eugene Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Nov.
State v. Amundson 828 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Amundson 828 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
review denied (Minn. Nov.
State v. Brist 799 N.W.2d 238 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Brist 799 N.W.2d 238 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
-40 (Minn.2001) (stating that commissioner has authority over matters of supervised release); -21 (Minn.App.2000) (“[T]he Commissioner of Corrections, not the sentencing court, is responsible for determining the conditions of a prisoner’s incarceration.”), review denied (Minn. Nov.
State v. Rausch 799 N.W.2d 19 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Meredyk 754 N.W.2d 596 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Meredyk 754 N.W.2d 596 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-19 (Minn.App.2000) (citing Minn. R.Crim.
State v. Verdon 727 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Verdon 727 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
-21 (Minn.App.2000) (“[T]he Commissioner of Corrections, not the sentencing court, is responsible for determining the conditions of a prisoner’s incarceration.”), review denied (Minn. Nov.
State v. Borrego 661 N.W.2d 663 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Borrego 661 N.W.2d 663 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
review denied (Minn. Nov.
State v. Noggle 657 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Noggle 657 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
A district court’s exercise of discretion relating to sentencing mil be reversed on appeal only if the “discretion is not properly exercised and the sentence is unauthorized by law.” review denied (Minn. Nov.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by