Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto's, Inc., 336 N.W.2d 46.
-
In re the Marriage of:
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto’s, Inc.
-
Karol M. Provost, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
If a party has appropriately made a request, we may award attorney fees on appeal when a statute enables it or a contract authorizes it, see Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto’s, Inc., or as a sanction, see Minn. R. Civ.
-
A24-0425
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Generally, attorney fees are not recoverable in litigation unless there is a specific contract permitting or a statute authorizing such recovery.” Northfield Care Ctr., (quoting Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto’s, Inc., ).
-
Darwin Boutain, et al., Appellants,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“Generally, attorney fees are not recover able in litigation unless there is a specific contract permitting or a statute authorizing such recovery.” Northfield Care Ctr., (quoting Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto’s, Inc., ).
-
Minn. 2021
Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto’s, Inc., State v. Dist.
-
Jodi D. Campbell, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See Anderson v. Medtronic, Inc., Bar/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto’s, Inc.
-
Richard T. Jellinger, et al., Appellants,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
If a party has appropriately made a request, we may award a ttorney fees on appeal when a statute enables it or a contract authorizes it, see Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto’s, Inc., , or as a sanction, Minn. R. Civ.
-
Faith Technologies, Inc., Respondent, Biosar America, LLC, Respondent, Frattalone Companies, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
If a party has appropriately made a request, we may award attorney 16 fees on appeal when a statute enables it or a contract authorizes it, see Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto’s, Inc., , or as a sanction, Minn. R. Civ.
-
William Jepsen, as Trustee for the Heirs and Next of Kin of Eric Parker Dean, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
d 264, 270 (Minn. 2010) (holding that the colla teral-source statute, which prohibits double recoveries in certain cases, partially abroga ted the common-law rule that a plaintiff’s recovery cannot be reduced by certain payments the plaintiff received outside the scope of their case); Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto’s, Inc., (noting the longstanding rule that attorn ey fees are not recoverable under the common law, unless a statute or specific contract says otherwise); -92 (Minn. 1955) (explaining ho
-
Herbert A. Igbanugo, et al., Appellants,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto’s, Inc. , (stating that attorney fees are not recoverable in litigation unless there is a specific contract permitting or a statute authorizing such recovery).
-
Manufacturing Solutions of Minnesota, Inc., et al., Appellants,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“The general rule in Minnesota is that ‘attorney fees are not recoverable in litigation unless there is a specific contract permitting or a statute authorizing such recovery.’” Dunn v. Nat’l Beverage Corp., (quoting Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto’s Inc. , ).
-
Timothy Aadland, et al., Respondents,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto’s, Inc.
- A & M Market LLC v. West Side Groceries, Inc., and third party v. Stryker Market, LLC, third … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
A & M Market LLC v. West Side Groceries, Inc., and third party v. Stryker Market, LLC, third …
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto’s, Inc.
- Lee D. Weiss, Weiss Capital Real Estate Group, LLC v. Private Capital, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
Lee D. Weiss, Weiss Capital Real Estate Group, LLC v. Private Capital, LLC
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto’s, Inc., -53 (Minn. 1983).
- City of Maple Grove v. Marketline Construction Capital, LLC 802 N.W.2d 809 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
-
City of Maple Grove v. Marketline Construction Capital, LLC
802 N.W.2d 809
Minn. Ct. App. 2011
See Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto’s Inc., (recognizing that attorney fees are generally not recoverable “unless there is a specific contract permitting or a statute authorizing such recovery”).
- Dunn v. National Beverage Corp. 745 N.W.2d 549 Minn. 2008
-
Dunn v. National Beverage Corp.
745 N.W.2d 549
Minn. 2008
The general rule in Minnesota is that “attorney fees are not recoverable in litigation unless there is a specific contract permitting or a statute authorizing such recovery.” Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto’s Inc.
- Dunn v. National Beverage Corp. 729 N.W.2d 637 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
-
Dunn v. National Beverage Corp.
729 N.W.2d 637
Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Generally, “attorney fees are not recoverable in litigation unless there is a specific contract permitting or a statute authorizing such recovery.” Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto’s
- Northfield Care Center, Inc. v. Anderson 707 N.W.2d 731 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
-
Northfield Care Center, Inc. v. Anderson
707 N.W.2d 731
Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Generally, “attorney fees are not recoverable in litigation unless there is a specific contract permitting or a statute authorizing such recovery.” Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto’s, Inc.
- Kvidera v. Rotation Engineering & Manufacturing Co. 705 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
-
Kvidera v. Rotation Engineering & Manufacturing Co.
705 N.W.2d 416
Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Attorney fees are not recoverable by a common-law breach-of-contract case absent “a specific contract or statute authorizing such recovery.” Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto’s, Inc.
- In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 652 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
-
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation
652 N.W.2d 46
Minn. Ct. App. 2002
See Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto’s, Inc.
- Marriage of Geske v. Marcolina 624 N.W.2d 813 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
-
Marriage of Geske v. Marcolina
624 N.W.2d 813
Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto’s, Inc.
- Hoang Minh Ly v. Nystrom 615 N.W.2d 302 Minn. 2000
-
Hoang Minh Ly v. Nystrom
615 N.W.2d 302
Minn. 2000
See Church of Nativity, d at 10 (Simonett, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part); see also Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto’s, Inc., (“We have long held that attorney fees are not recoverable in litigation unless there is a specific contract permitting or a statute authorizing such recovery.”).
- Washington v. Independent School District No. 625 610 N.W.2d 347 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-
Washington v. Independent School District No. 625
610 N.W.2d 347
Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto’s, Inc.
- Kallok v. Medtronic, Inc. 573 N.W.2d 356 Minn. 1998
-
Kallok v. Medtronic, Inc.
573 N.W.2d 356
Minn. 1998
Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto’s, Inc., Alyeska Pipeline Serv.
- Lickteig v. Alderson, Ondov, Leonard & Sween, P.A. 556 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1996
-
Lickteig v. Alderson, Ondov, Leonard & Sween, P.A.
556 N.W.2d 557
Minn. 1996
See Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto’s, Inc., -53 (Minn.1983).
- Van Vickle v. C.W. Scheurer & Sons, Inc. 556 N.W.2d 238 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
-
Van Vickle v. C.W. Scheurer & Sons, Inc.
556 N.W.2d 238
Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto’s, Inc.
- Molenaar v. United Cattle Co. 553 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
-
Molenaar v. United Cattle Co.
553 N.W.2d 424
Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto’s, Inc.
- Johnson v. City of Shorewood 531 N.W.2d 509 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-
Johnson v. City of Shorewood
531 N.W.2d 509
Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto’s, Inc.
- State Bank of Cokato v. Ziehwein 510 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-
State Bank of Cokato v. Ziehwein
510 N.W.2d 268
Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto’s, Inc.
- Bowman v. Bowman 493 N.W.2d 141 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
-
Bowman v. Bowman
493 N.W.2d 141
Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto’s, Inc.
- Corazalla v. Quie 473 N.W.2d 347 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
-
Corazalla v. Quie
473 N.W.2d 347
Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto’s, Inc.